ronthenekred Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 You really think a stint in a Cat A prison is appropriate? And like i said before family courts are secret so we prob never find out and mums word is good enough as evidence she can accuse of whatecer she wants with no evidence. If some one told you you couldnt see your child would you not do anything you could even just for a glimps for a minute. I know I would and have. Being a loving devoted father yourself I'm surprised you're not asking the same question HN is. Mostly the replies are non factual based. Without the facts how can anyone give a reasonable reply? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clownaround Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Being a loving devoted father yourself I'm surprised you're not asking the same question HN is. Mostly the replies are non factual based. Without the facts how can anyone give a reasonable reply? I am a loving father but i am being stopped by my ex from seeing my kids. If I ring thier school to see how they are doing I am in contempt but i ring anyway cos i care. A woman scorned can be very nasty indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 He was charged with harrassment for the balloons and intimidating his ex with a banner saying happy birthday We know that - what we are trying to stablish is why the banning order was made in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clownaround Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 We know that - what we are trying to stablish is why the banning order was made in the first place. A vindictive coniving ex wife Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clownaround Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 We who in engage in nonviolent direct action are not the creators of tension. We merely bring to the surface the hidden tension that is already alive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronthenekred Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 A vindictive coniving ex wife Or a sadistic ex husband. Or do you think they don't exist based on your own circumstances? Or is your own circumstances leading you to bias? If his wife is using the child as allegedly yours is then you have a point, but your circumstances in this case is irrelevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 A vindictive coniving ex wife And you can evidence this in this particular case? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clownaround Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 We know that - what we are trying to stablish is why the banning order was made in the first place. 'Please refer to post 19 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 'Please refer to post 19 Which doesn't have any evidence why the original order was made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mort Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 As this is now going in circles.... closing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.