I1L2T3 Posted July 17, 2011 Author Share Posted July 17, 2011 Your logic is deeply flawed I1L2T3. In the UK we require people to defend actualities, not conjecture. The questions need to at least be asked. What briefings did he recieve from Coulson? Was the info gathered legally? Did Cameron gain advantage from it? What was discussed during his frequent social meetings with Brooks? etc... etc... etc... I can't see people believing his answers, especially as this whole thing gets progressively worse. People will think Cameron is hiding something because......for a start he spent most of the last 2 weeks hiding. Interviews that PM should be giving are being handled by Clegg. Cameron has the look of somebody cornered and he isn't exactly coming out fighting. He can't. Too weak with all his props pulled out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mj.scuba Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 How did they know, did they get the info from hacking? And stop trying to change the subject and pass it off lightly. This is all about Slaphead Came Ruin and his association with the hacking lark Andy Coulson. Coulson left the PM's wing because he knew he was going to be in the papers and didn't want bad publicity. Too late! http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12296392 Indeed, but did Coulson commit any of the deeds whilst being employed by No.10, like Damien McBride? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted July 17, 2011 Author Share Posted July 17, 2011 Indeed, but did Coulson commit any of the deeds whilst being employed by No.10, like Damien McBride? Not really comparing like with like. Coulson may have committed serious crimes. McBride was never arrested. I doubt very much you have truly grasped the scale of what is happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mj.scuba Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Not really comparing like with like. Coulson may have committed serious crimes. McBride was never arrested. I doubt very much you have truly grasped the scale of what is happening. I have grasped it alright. Have you grasped that whatever Coulson did it happened in a previous employment, before being employed by No.10? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sibon Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 I have grasped it alright. Have you grasped that whatever Coulson did it happened in a previous employment, before being employed by No.10? The "previous" bit is the interesting part. He was carrying a massive amount of baggage when Cameron appointed him. That is beginning to look like a massive error of judgement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted July 17, 2011 Author Share Posted July 17, 2011 I have grasped it alright. Have you grasped that whatever Coulson did it happened in a previous employment, before being employed by No.10? Oh I see now. So if he'd committed crimes before it didn't matter. Of course it matters. Especially so if the alleged crimes may have provided advantage to his new employer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mj.scuba Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Oh I see now. So if he'd committed crimes before it didn't matter. Of course it matters. Especially so if the alleged crimes may have provided advantage to his new employer. Where did I say it didn't matter? Now your alleging that Cameron somehow benefitted from the phone hacking and information gained in that manner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted July 17, 2011 Author Share Posted July 17, 2011 Where did I say it didn't matter? Now your alleging that Cameron somehow benefitted from the phone hacking and information gained in that manner? I'm not alleging anything. I said 'may have'. Obviously the questions relating to that will be asked at some point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
websters gue Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 We've got the cops, press and politicians, all we need now is a drug kingpin and a few smugglers. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFDOPPVReHs&feature=related Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wednesday1 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Where did I say it didn't matter? Now your alleging that Cameron somehow benefitted from the phone hacking and information gained in that manner? I don't think that he is alleging that Smarmy Dave has hacked any phones himself, at this stage. Certainly I have not read any reports yet alleging Cameron is himself a hacker, but things are moving so fast, who knows whats coming next! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.