Sausage Dog Posted July 23, 2011 Share Posted July 23, 2011 Why does it need to be a terrorist organisation who did this? It actually reminds me of the Port Arthur Massacre in 1996, when a bloke called Martin Bryant went on a shooting spree. He wasn't a terrorist, he was mentally unstable. And the difference is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poppins Posted July 23, 2011 Share Posted July 23, 2011 My guess is the Americans will be involved somehow. Why are you just Guessing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Sidney Posted July 23, 2011 Share Posted July 23, 2011 I don't think its an act of terrorism. Its an act of mass murder by a nutter. There are no issues between the Christian world and the West or Norway and to try to use this as a mirage is silly... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suffragette1 Posted July 23, 2011 Share Posted July 23, 2011 Bloody fundies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Joker Posted July 23, 2011 Share Posted July 23, 2011 I don't think its an act of terrorism. Its an act of mass murder by a nutter. There are no issues between the Christian world and the West or Norway and to try to use this as a mirage is silly... And yet, I'm sure if a Muslim committed the act, many on here would be condemning it as an act of terrorism (as they did yesterday) and holding every single Muslim on earth collectively responsible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted July 23, 2011 Share Posted July 23, 2011 And yet, I'm sure if a Muslim committed the act, many on here would be condemning it as an act of terrorism (as they did yesterday) and holding every single Muslim on earth collectively responsible. And many would disagree with them - even though we have a number of muslims and / or sympathisers who blame everything on Israel and / or the west. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted July 23, 2011 Share Posted July 23, 2011 I don't think its an act of terrorism. Its an act of mass murder by a nutter. There are no issues between the Christian world and the West or Norway and to try to use this as a mirage is silly... This wasn't an attack on Norway per se, it was an attack, or an act of terrorism on the Norwegian Labour party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Streamline Posted July 23, 2011 Share Posted July 23, 2011 This wasn't an attack on Norway per se, it was an attack, or an act of terrorism on the Norwegian Labour party. Why was that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinz Posted July 23, 2011 Share Posted July 23, 2011 I don't think its an act of terrorism. Its an act of mass murder by a nutter. There are no issues between the Christian world and the West or Norway and to try to use this as a mirage is silly... Don't be so damn stupid frank, of course it's terrorism. You can't go around killing people indiscriminately while setting a bomb off killing more and not call it terrorism. The fact he killed a hundred people indicates he's a mass murderer, it doesn't take Einstein to figure that one out. Or is it a case of trying to remove the word "terrorism" from the crime to somehow sanitise it from other acts of terror worldwide? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altus Posted July 23, 2011 Share Posted July 23, 2011 I don't think its an act of terrorism. Its an act of mass murder by a nutter. He blew up a bomb and shot lots of people as a protest against people not following his political views. How is that not terrorism? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.