sccsux Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 is not clear, understandable and meaningful terms! Of course it is. Just because you fail to understand the meaning, it doesn't follow that it is not written in "clear, understandable and meaningful terms" which it is, to anyone who works in the industry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted July 28, 2011 Author Share Posted July 28, 2011 He was clear. Nope. He said This leads to a dramatic imbalance in terms of computational configuration of processing architectures. You rewrote this as It causes a bottleneck. Isn't your version clearer than his? Do tell! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted July 28, 2011 Author Share Posted July 28, 2011 Your OP was plenty clear enough (how ironical). Is that like 'ironic'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Erikson Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Nope. He said This leads to a dramatic imbalance in terms of computational configuration of processing architectures. You rewrote this as It causes a bottleneck. Isn't your version clearer than his? Do tell! Yo pulled the article from the Business pages regarding business computing. Why should it be dumbed down? Two of us understood it perfectly well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L00b Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Is that like 'ironic'?Is that the best answer to my post which you could manage? Poor form, old chap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Erikson Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Is that the best answer to my post which you could manage? Poor form, old chap He's an English snob. The dullest of dull and when they lose the pick out an error in your English. It's almost like a race card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Two of us understood it perfectly well. Only two? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L00b Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 He's an English snob. The dullest of dull and when they lose the pick out an error in your English.That appears incompatible with his posts about Brobst's piece Unless Jeffrey merely believes he's an English snob He's an English snob. The dullest of dull and when they lose the pick out an error in your English. It's almost like a race card.I wouldn't take it as such...even though I'm not a Brit and English is not my first language/mother tongue Incidentally (and funnily enough) my job is, by and large, to write technico-legal documents, which would appear positively baffling compared to Mr Brobst's article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
esme Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Mod Note Kindly stop bickering and return to the topic or the thread will be closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted July 28, 2011 Author Share Posted July 28, 2011 Thank you. Please can everyone re-read post #1, explaining the point of the thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.