Tony Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Choudary, who runs the banned militant group Islam4UK, warned: ‘We now have hundreds if not thousands of people up and down the country willing to go out and patrol the streets for us and a print run of between 10,000 and 50,000 stickers ready for distribution. Honestly, some of you are so gullible. Choudrey has about a dozen followers - that's less than the number of people contributing to this thread. Just ignore him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Honestly, some of you are so gullible. Choudrey has about a dozen followers - that's less than the number of people contributing to this thread. Perhaps he's claiming every Muslim member of a neighbourhood watch group as "willing to go out and patrol the streets for us." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 see: (John Harris) and (parking fines) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRMr1...eature=related Statutes are NOT laws!!! There are many many more and i'm sure you can find them just like I have done. Ah - the crazy "strawman created by your birth certificate" argument. It's rubbish. Acts of Parliament are statutes and are law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 I think it's MORE than just "putting stickers on lamp posts." no its a few idiots that WANT sharia law in this country BUT WONT GET IT, they just have far too much time on their hands and hatched yet another new plan to annoy people, nothing less nothing more. this country has never been under sharia law, isnt now and never will Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe9T Posted July 28, 2011 Author Share Posted July 28, 2011 Errrrrrrrr - no. That is "freeman on the land" mumbo jumbo. We all have to abide by statutory laws whether or not we like them. "Statutory laws "or "acts of parliament only have the "force of law" if you "contract" with them. Believe me or not, but that is the truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 In no case can such courts try criminal cases, or impose punishments. They can only arbitrate in civil disputes - and, to repeat the point, only if all parties involved agree to let them. Nobody can ever be hauled before a Sharia court against their will. I would largely agree although I suspect some muslims would be under severe family / community pressure to "choose" sharia for arbitration. But the idea that sharia could be used in the way proposed by Choudrey and his few mates is a non-starter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 "Statutory laws "or "acts of parliament only have the "force of law" if you "contract" with them. Believe me or not, but that is the truth. No it isn't -it's "freeman on the land" mumbo jumbo. A few people have tried it in court and come of worse - the bloke who tried it in Birkenhead has since been declared bankrupt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecky Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Because the loons and cranks of the MAC only number about 17 people. And that's after about 3 years You do not have to be a member of it to be affected by it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 No it isn't -it's "freeman on the land" mumbo jumbo. A few people have tried it in court and come of worse - the bloke who tried it in Birkenhead has since been declared bankrupt. No doubt he continues to maintain that he isn't really bankrupt because the bankruptcy court has no jurisdiction over him. It doesn't help his credit rating though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 I would largely agree although I suspect some muslims would be under severe family / community pressure to "choose" sharia for arbitration. In certain cases I suspect you'd be right; on the other hand, if you're thinking of the same sort of groups that I am, who go in for honour killings and other such obscenities ... I seriously doubt that going to a civil court has ever been an option. In the absence of a Sharia court they'd simply be under the same amount of pressure to do as they were told by the family/community that believed Sharia should hold sway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.