MAMALOCHA! Posted December 22, 2011 Share Posted December 22, 2011 Where as Iran and quite a few people probably want to erase Israeli indentity ... your point is? Oh forgot, and probably wipe out one or two more countries too as they've been trying to do since 632AD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdol_Hossein_Sardari doesn't fit into your iranian opinion does it. The translation of ahmadinajad's speech is a western lie as even (MEMRI) translated the phrase similarly, as "this regime" must be "eliminated from the pages of history. not wipe off the map. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAMALOCHA! Posted December 22, 2011 Share Posted December 22, 2011 There's no such place as 'Palestine' [see other threads, passim] so there's no 'identity' to erase. The UN would say your wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAMALOCHA! Posted December 22, 2011 Share Posted December 22, 2011 True, so who diverted it off-topic? When iran got mentioned in a egyption thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spooky3 Posted December 22, 2011 Share Posted December 22, 2011 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdol_Hossein_Sardari doesn't fit into your iranian opinion does it. The translation of ahmadinajad's speech is a western lie as even (MEMRI) translated the phrase similarly, as "this regime" must be "eliminated from the pages of history. not wipe off the map. You're right, your version is worse! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAMALOCHA! Posted December 22, 2011 Share Posted December 22, 2011 Any way the people have chose and the government do what they wish on there own land Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Dome Posted December 22, 2011 Share Posted December 22, 2011 The translation of ahmadinajad's speech is a western lie as even (MEMRI) translated the phrase similarly, as "this regime" must be "eliminated from the pages of history. not wipe off the map. "death to israel" is a common meme in his work. of course this just means death to the government, and not the state itself, which as we all know, the neighbours have no issue with. oh wait - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spooky3 Posted December 22, 2011 Share Posted December 22, 2011 Any way the people have chose and the government do what they wish on there own land No, because the people of the land are being bullied into choice, it's now worse than it was under Mubarack! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAMALOCHA! Posted December 22, 2011 Share Posted December 22, 2011 Wait and see what happens when Israel is at war and the oil supply from Iran dries up... Interesting point, i think the world will suffer if iran is attacked as they would damage passage of most oil through the hormuz strait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Dome Posted December 22, 2011 Share Posted December 22, 2011 who buys iranian oil? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAMALOCHA! Posted December 22, 2011 Share Posted December 22, 2011 No, because the people of the land are being bullied into choice, it's now worse than it was under Mubarack! they have a choice to vote for who they want which they didn't under mubarak, i think the outcome is the issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.