AJ sheffield Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 They both belong to some adult. Is the adult responsible for accidents involving them, or is he not? Mere word play. Anyone who would compare a cat to a child only deserves to have cats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
megalithic Posted August 1, 2011 Author Share Posted August 1, 2011 Its ok love, he was probably just being polite. (Im not actually in love with you by the way) Andy knows only insults, not terms of endearment or local speak. I forgive him totally though, i never hold grudges against retards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OOmpa Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 I think the emoticon for those that don't get things is this one No its this one it means confused is that ok with you ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 I have a question, Why does anyone mentioning cats provoke such stern responses ? Most of them don't. But then, most people mentioning cats are not asking whether or not they can claim money from a cat's owner in exchange for having driven over it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
megalithic Posted August 1, 2011 Author Share Posted August 1, 2011 Did the driver try to make you pay for his damage, on the grounds that the child was yours? No, seeing as the child was on the pavement when he was killed. Btw, that is a bit heartless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 Mere word play. Anyone who would compare a cat to a child only deserves to have cats. There is no comparison. There is an exact identity. You run over, and kill, a creature belonging to some adult. Will you claim compensation from the adult? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 No, seeing as the child was on the pavement when he was killed. Btw, that is a bit heartless. You don't think it is. You are asking whether it's acceptable to do exactly that. You don't appear to have any consistency in your position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ sheffield Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 No, seeing as the child was on the pavement when he was killed. Btw, that is a bit heartless. More than just a bit heartless, in fact its the sort of thing you would hear from someone with some sort of syndrome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 More than just a bit heartless, in fact its the sort of thing you would hear from someone with some sort of syndrome. We heard it in the very first post, from Megalithic himself. (Or herself?) It seems odd that you support him in one post and then post something like this in the very next. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ sheffield Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 You don't think it is. You are asking whether it's acceptable to do exactly that. You don't appear to have any consistency in your position. No, he is asking about a cat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.