Jump to content

False Rape


Recommended Posts

Though you quoted my post, you totally ignored the point I made. If two people give conflicting evidence, but there is no other evidence for the jury to consider, then it is very unlikely that they would convict a defendant. This is nothing to do with whether the defendant is a man and the other party is a woman, it is simply because the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt will not have been met.

 

I did not ignore it, I gave my perception of why this is the case. As someone else said on this or another thread, many jurors seem to want to convict (or not) before even hearing the evidence, based on whether they like the cut of the job of the defendant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.