Jump to content

Ian Duncan Smith - article in the daily mail.


Recommended Posts

You're being a little alarmist there.

 

From the article:

 

Mr Duncan Smith even claimed the recent riots were a blessing in disguise because they would help the Government justify radical benefits reforms to make work pay.

 

Isn't that what most of us have been wanting for years?

 

Of course, whether he has the backbone to push through those reforms is another matter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're being a little alarmist there.

 

From the article:

 

Mr Duncan Smith even claimed the recent riots were a blessing in disguise because they would help the Government justify radical benefits reforms to make work pay.

 

Isn't that what most of us have been wanting for years?

 

Of course, whether he has the backbone to push through those reforms is another matter

 

 

When the Tories say they will make work pay I don't imagine it means they are going to raise the minimum wage but rather it is another way of saying they will cut benefits.

 

When people have less money in their pockets they can't afford to buy consumer goods and the economy stagnates. That is what is happening now. Cameron isn't bright enough to understand this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the Tories say they will make work pay I don't imagine it means they are going to raise the minimum wage but rather it is another way of saying they will cut benefits.

 

When people have less money in their pockets they can't afford to buy consumer goods and the economy stagnates. That is what is happening now. Cameron isn't bright eough to inderstand this.

 

It's actually a way of saying that benefits will be reduced when you start work in a way that means you are always better off by working or by working more. Unlike the current situation that can mean that if you start work you're overall income actually falls, clearly a disincentive to work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the Tories say they will make work pay I don't imagine it means they are going to raise the minimum wage but rather it is another way of saying they will cut benefits.

 

When people have less money in their pockets they can't afford to buy consumer goods and the economy stagnates. That is what is happening now. Cameron isn't bright enough to understand this.

 

They will still have money in their pockets and be able to buy things if the "can't work, won't work" crew actually decide to accept that they can't indefinitely be given money for doing nothing, and they'll have to work for it instead, like the rest of us mere mortals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.