Lady Star Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 Either you're trying to be funny, in which case you aren't. Or you're thick, in which case you are. Neither - the question was asked incorrectly - 911 is a real line, 9/11 was a terrorist attack in the US... Two very different things - perhaps it is you who are the thick one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harleyman Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 I visited Ground Zero in July. It was a very moving experience. I think in the minds of many Americans it has become something of a sacred spot. All the conspiracy rubbish spouted by the America phobes was already posted on another thread some months ago which ran to near a 100 pages. To those members who expressed respect in their posts I say thank you all very much. To those others who dont know what the word respect means I just say "get some class and an education along with it" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pidgeon Posted September 6, 2011 Share Posted September 6, 2011 It's amazing how they manage to hit the runway at the end of every flight. (JFK runway 46m wide, WTC 63m wide) Airports have transponder beacons which help pilots to land, they also have air traffic towers to help guide them in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamingjimmy Posted September 6, 2011 Share Posted September 6, 2011 Airports have transponder beacons which help pilots to land, they also have air traffic towers to help guide them in. The Towers were the tallest things in the whole skyline, what you think they'd have trouble finding them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0742Sheff Posted September 6, 2011 Share Posted September 6, 2011 I visited Ground Zero in July. It was a very moving experience. I think in the minds of many Americans it has become something of a sacred spot. All the conspiracy rubbish spouted by the America phobes was already posted on another thread some months ago which ran to near a 100 pages. To those members who expressed respect in their posts I say thank you all very much. To those others who dont know what the word respect means I just say "get some class and an education along with it" Not sure if i expressed respect but i have tried to explain that the conspiracy theorists are talking utter drivel. Unfortunately these theorists will believe anything that strays from any official line. They are blinded to scientific and practical proof and prefer to believe any old nut job posting a blog on the net. I also find it interesting that the conspiracy nuts choose to post from new accounts, rather than use their usual accounts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
splodgeyAl Posted September 6, 2011 Share Posted September 6, 2011 Nope, the report does explain the collapse, and it never suggested that the fire weakened all the steel at the same time. Why not read it, it'll save you from inventing reasons as to why you think it never happened.On which page does it explain the collapse of building 7? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrapeApe Posted September 6, 2011 Share Posted September 6, 2011 It's only the type of folk who believe that the US staged 7 fake moon missions who still cling to these totally unbelievable and groundless theories about the WTC attacks...an why on earth start another thread about it when theres a mega one knocking about somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Prime Posted September 6, 2011 Share Posted September 6, 2011 So I presume you also mean that all columns weakened at the same time with some miraculous non resistance Are you an engineer? An architect? To my knowledge the consensus amongst serious qualified engineers is in line with the official report. Judging by your reference to JFK it seems you are a habitual conspiracy theorist. It would help us gauge your credibility if you informed us what conspiracies you believe in and which you dismiss. Do you for example believe the moon landings were fake? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davekowl Posted September 6, 2011 Share Posted September 6, 2011 The conspiracy theorists have been reading too many novels and watching too many films. They will trot out an alternative theory for anything that happens that suits their vivid imaginations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMoran Posted September 6, 2011 Share Posted September 6, 2011 You really hit the nail on the head with that user name didn't you... No one apart from you conspiracy nut jobs believe that jet fuel melted the main steel supports. All it did was weaken them. If you could be bothered to look in to it you would also find that hundreds of steel framed buildings collapse during fires. The reason building #7 collapsed was just the same except it was on fire for a lot longer. All these rocks being thrown but none of you can come up with a reasoned argument as to how America went about bringing the towers down Right. I'm off to take pictures of the fairies down the bottom of my garden. Er yes i did. Its my name:loopy: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.