LDeville Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 Hi Do you not get fed up with the tree hugging fools. trhe rant about "planning consent, where 17% pallning apps are rejected, but fro travellers it's 95%." The reason for this is simple - most of the travellers apps are on green belt land. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irenewilde Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 How remarkable that they 'get a bad press'. Perhaps that's because they live a life of crime, stealing from innocent taxpayers, making life hell for people who live close to their sites, demanding money with menaces from local businesses for protection, ripping off old people for shoddy work, the list goes on. Some people choose to defend them, though for what reason is anybody's guess. And they are absolutely above the law with the police afraid to do anything about them even when they have proof that a crime has been committed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altus Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 Hi Do you not get fed up with the tree hugging fools. trhe rant about "planning consent, where 17% pallning apps are rejected, but fro travellers it's 95%." The reason for this is simple - most of the travellers apps are on green belt land. You appear to be getting your bogeymen mixed up. A tree hugger would object to someone building without planning permission whether they were travellers, Persimmon or some small builder building a single house. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnvqsos Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 It is bizzare;supermarkets frequently break planning laws by exceeding the quotas imposed by local authorities,exceeding their alloted floor space for greed.This site was a scrap yard,and their occupation of that yard is tantamount to using a brown-field site. So many mainstream thinkers join the moral majority and condemn those with an alternative lifestyle,rather than stick up for the underdog.I hope you all sleep at night and on those nights when these families are seeking a safe haven. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnvqsos Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 I don't get it, you only have to watch father ted to realise that there are so many remote wide open spaces in Ireland where ALL the gypsies in the world could relocate without any bother. Why not go there instead? I'm starting to think they like causing trouble. Father Ted is shot in Dumfries and Galloway:hihi: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FACEBOOK Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 I'm watching this case very closely because if they are not evicted I'm going to build an apartment block in my garden and fill it with housing benefit tenants and chem1st is going to be the caretaker. Kerrrching!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnvqsos Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 I'm watching this case very closely because if they are not evicted I'm going to build an apartment block in my garden and fill it with housing benefit tenants and chem1st is going to be the caretaker. Kerrrching!!! You cant build apartments on benefits mi old Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FACEBOOK Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 Father Ted is shot in Dumfries and Galloway:hihi: Don't be silly, Father Ted is in Ireland and is obviously shot in Ireland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FACEBOOK Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 You cant build apartments on benefits mi old I'm not going to build the Apartments on benefits, but the tenants will be on benefits, is that not clear? Stop trying to rain on my new cash cow parade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altus Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 It is bizzare;supermarkets frequently break planning laws by exceeding the quotas imposed by local authorities,exceeding their alloted floor space for greed. What makes you think people approve of supermarkets breaking planning regulations? This site was a scrap yard,and their occupation of that yard is tantamount to using a brown-field site. If it was a brown field site they would have found it much easier to get planning permission. Retrospective applications for planning permission are not allowed because otherwise everyone would build first and ask permission later. To discourage that behaviour, the rules say restore the property to how it was before your application will be considered. So many mainstream thinkers join the moral majority and condemn those with an alternative lifestyle,rather than stick up for the underdog.I hope you all sleep at night and on those nights when these families are seeking a safe haven. You're lumping everyone who disagrees with their actions together. Had they applied for planning permission and it had been rejected after the locals raised a fuss because they didn't want travellers living nearby I'd have been supporting them. My objection is they broke the planning laws. Allowing exceptions to that sets a dangerous precedent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.