Mr Bojangles Posted September 24, 2011 Share Posted September 24, 2011 I give you about a month then you'll be back with another i.d. No, I'm happy with this one which is all I require, thank you all the same. Perhaps you're not as clever as you think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bojangles Posted September 24, 2011 Share Posted September 24, 2011 Because clearly Sheffield Forum know better The term 'armchair experts' seems somehow too mild. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mj.scuba Posted September 24, 2011 Share Posted September 24, 2011 I wonder if sticking their head on a pike would have a better deterrent effect than the death penalty itself. -- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bojangles Posted September 24, 2011 Share Posted September 24, 2011 I wonder if sticking their head on a pike would have a better deterant effect than the death penalty itself.Now we're talkin' ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sierra Posted September 24, 2011 Share Posted September 24, 2011 Does anyone read anything I type or am I wasting my time. Laurence brewer on this thread page three, chained a black guy to a pick up and drove round until he was dead in 1998. I read it! I read everything. In any case, Lawrence Brewer was executed the same day as Troy Davis. Los Angeles Times While I personally feel that Troy Davis was most likely guilty, there was enough doubt that his life should have been spared. It does bother me that the media seem to be very selective about what people hear. Also, you can be certain that there were facts presented to the court (in both cases) that are not for public consumption. Therefore it's impossible for us to know everything about these cases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sierra Posted September 24, 2011 Share Posted September 24, 2011 The term 'armchair experts' seems somehow too mild. You said a whole mouthful there, brother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RootsBooster Posted September 24, 2011 Share Posted September 24, 2011 You said a whole mouthful there, brother. Also, we only get a fraction of the news coverage you do, whether that be factual or not, I don't know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArchViz Posted September 24, 2011 Share Posted September 24, 2011 Or that terrorists can kill a few thousand people in New York and instead of lying down and doing nothing we have trained personnel who can go after these people which means of course having to pursue them into foreign countries as I'm sure that if a polite notice was handed to the governments of these countries requesting their extradition the answer would be a four letter word in Arabic But what did it have to do with the 300,000 dead Iraqi civilians that the 'trained personnel killed'. You keep spouting about evidence and justice but there wasn't any to justify the invasion of Iraq so Governments and the institutions can and will continue to get it wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sierra Posted September 24, 2011 Share Posted September 24, 2011 Also, we only get a fraction of the news coverage you do, whether that be factual or not, I don't know Of course. With the internet nowadays, it's possible to read the news from just about anywhere in the world, at which I'm pleasantly amazed and consider to be a great luxury. The veracity of said news sources I'm not sure about. It is fun to see what's considered "news" in other parts of the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crookesey Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Or that terrorists can kill a few thousand people in New York and instead of lying down and doing nothing we have trained personnel who can go after these people which means of course having to pursue them into foreign countries as I'm sure that if a polite notice was handed to the governments of these countries requesting their extradition the answer would be a four letter word in Arabic If an American citizen say, committed mass murder in the UK, and managed to return home prior to detection, he/she would be protected from extradition by the Bill of Rights, is that fair? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.