JFKvsNixon Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 The article has today's date on it! John X It was actually dated for the 14th Jan 2010! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
websters gue Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 The article has today's date on it! John X That's the case when you go on newspapers websites John, the article was from the 14th January 2010 but it's the 17th of October today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balpin Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 The ConDems - Robin Hood in reverse, robbing from the poor to give to the rich! At least they are giving it to you, the Rich that is. When are they giving it to the Balpins, that what I want to know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 That's the case when you go on newspapers websites John, the article was from the 14th January 2010 but it's the 17th of October today. Surely than it was a blow to the credibility on the 14th of January last year? A blow that actually didn't knock the credibility? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titanic99 Posted October 17, 2011 Author Share Posted October 17, 2011 I dont have figures to hand right now, but what I will say is this, the Tories tend to do the thankless, unsexy job of getting the countries books in order, then when they do Labour get voted in, go ape ****, then the Tories are put back in to pick up the pieces again, and round and round in circles it goes. If that was true, then how would you explain the high deficit levels from 1992-98 when they had been in power for 13 years. These figures would have been a lot of worse as well if they hadn't have benefitted from £55 Billion pounds worth of North Sea Oil revenue. Reality is, most of it went on paying people to be unemployed and this current lot are making the same mistakes. http://www.gfmag.com/tools/global-database/economic-data/10395-public-deficit-by-country.html#axzz1VZQBVP9j Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
websters gue Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 Surely than it was a blow to the credibility on the 14th of January last year? A blow that actually didn't knock the credibility? A lot of folk may not have seen the article on the 14th of January last year. Do you think a health secretary who is being bankrolled by the head of one of the biggest private health providers to the NHS is credible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titanic99 Posted October 17, 2011 Author Share Posted October 17, 2011 A lot of folk may not have seen the article on the 14th of January last year. Do you think a health secretary who is being bankrolled by the head of one of the biggest private health providers to the NHS is credible? This chap was on Question Time last week and got ripped apart by a G.P. Apparently the new legislation for the changes mentions the word "competition" 86 times but we aren't going to see privatisation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 A lot of folk may not have seen the article on the 14th of January last year. Do you think a health secretary who is being bankrolled by the head of one of the biggest private health providers to the NHS is credible? As opposed to the Labour's Director-General for Commissioning and System Management Mark Britnell who was quoted as saying: “In future, The NHS will be a state insurance provider not a state deliverer. The NHS will be shown no mercy and the best time to take advantage of this will be in the next couple of years.” The truth is that nobody has gone as far as the previous Labour government has in privatising the NHS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricgem2002 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 A lot of folk may not have seen the article on the 14th of January last year. Do you think a health secretary who is being bankrolled by the head of one of the biggest private health providers to the NHS is credible? in a word no but the tories on here wont beleive it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 Another blow to the credibility of this mob. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/6989408/Andrew-Lansley-bankrolled-by-private-healthcare-provider.html What kind of blow? http://www.theyworkforyou.com/regmem/?p=10349 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.