johncocker Posted September 28, 2011 Share Posted September 28, 2011 Why don't you go and check for yourself? So what way did you choose to check Black History Month? have you got alzheimers as well as that chip on your shoulder? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shims Posted September 28, 2011 Share Posted September 28, 2011 so shoud'nt it be "nonwhite history month" .......... So what way did you choose to check Black History Month? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shims Posted September 28, 2011 Share Posted September 28, 2011 Caricature perhaps, but hardly malicious. It was a portrayal which, at the time it was introduced, had no malice whatsoever. People did not then appreciate that society's views would soon evolve, so their actions in introducing a goliwog doll may have been misguided, naive, or without appropriate consideration, but they were quite normal for the time and to call it 'malicious' is drama-queening at the very least. You're entirely incorrect. I suggest you investigate further. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conrod Posted September 28, 2011 Share Posted September 28, 2011 You're entirely incorrect. I suggest you investigate further.Enlighten me, oh font of anti-racism knowledge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shims Posted September 28, 2011 Share Posted September 28, 2011 have you got alzheimers as well as that chip on your shoulder? Can't answer ... I have it has'nt:roll: How surprising: I guess you must have lied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted September 28, 2011 Share Posted September 28, 2011 Caricature perhaps, but hardly malicious. It was a portrayal which, at the time it was introduced, had no malice whatsoever. People did not then appreciate that society's views would soon evolve, so their actions in introducing a goliwog doll may have been misguided, naive, or without appropriate consideration, but they were quite normal for the time and to call it 'malicious' is drama-queening at the very least. There were also the racists who used poor golly symbolically to persecute a group of people. Have a look at "Winston" being sacrificed and bear in mind this is the 21st Century Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shims Posted September 28, 2011 Share Posted September 28, 2011 Enlighten me, oh font of anti-racism knowledge. Anti-racism is a positive thing, oh sarcastic one. I've posted a link before on a similar thread some time before. The historical use is very easy to find online. as I said, I suggest you investigate further. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nagel Posted September 28, 2011 Share Posted September 28, 2011 I was originally ambivalent about 'black history month' but the more I follow this thread the more it demonstrates how valuable such an event is. William Wilberforce, the (white) abolitionist from Hull is a hero in black culture. There's even a private university in America named after him which was historically black. http://www.wilberforce.edu/home/home.html William Wilberforce is the most famous ex-pupil of the school I attended. One of the houses was named after him and more recently the Archbishop o' York unveiled a statue of him in the front courtyard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nagel Posted September 28, 2011 Share Posted September 28, 2011 funny how it was the white british were the first to abolish it though isn't it:D I wonder if that will get a mention in black history month It's not funny, it's something we can be proud of and I'm sure it will get a mention in BHM in this country, if not in the USA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conrod Posted September 28, 2011 Share Posted September 28, 2011 There were also the racists who used poor golly symbolically to persecute a group of people. Have a look at "Winston" being sacrificed and bear in mind this is the 21st Century BNP idiots being what they are does not mean that the original creation of a child's doll was done from malice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.