MC Spyda Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 Is there anything out there that is widely accepted which you personally disbelieve? Maybe it's the big bang theory or the theory of evolution for example. Personally for me it's anti matter. I am not sold on the idea of anti matter, no matter how much I read up on it or watch videos. I just can not come to terms with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ampersand Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 I wouldn't say I disbelieve the big bang but I can't get my head round where it all came from in the first place Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithy266 Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 I don't believe it's not butter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 Someone once told me that Elvis is still alive and lives in a Bungalow in Whrlow, poppycock! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rickiethecat Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 I don't believe that the Daily Mail and its readers are as bad as they're made out to be on here. I think it's a decent honest newspaper that highlights the truths the PC brigade don't want us to hear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phanerothyme Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 'Management Theory' - it's up there with astrology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upinwath Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.4897 The OPERA neutrino experiment at the underground Gran Sasso Laboratory has measured the velocity of neutrinos from the CERN CNGS beam over a baseline of about 730 km with much higher accuracy than previous studies conducted with accelerator neutrinos. The measurement is based on high-statistics data taken by OPERA in the years 2009, 2010 and 2011. Dedicated upgrades of the CNGS timing system and of the OPERA detector, as well as a high precision geodesy campaign for the measurement of the neutrino baseline, allowed reaching comparable systematic and statistical accuracies. An early arrival time of CNGS muon neutrinos with respect to the one computed assuming the speed of light in vacuum of (60.7 \pm 6.9 (stat.) \pm 7.4 (sys.)) ns was measured. This anomaly corresponds to a relative difference of the muon neutrino velocity with respect to the speed of light (v-c)/c = (2.48 \pm 0.28 (stat.) \pm 0.30 (sys.)) \times 10-5. I've been arguing that Einstein was a bit of a moron with his daft theory about the speed of light being constant for ages. Looks like I'm finally to be proven right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC Spyda Posted October 10, 2011 Author Share Posted October 10, 2011 http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.4897 I've been arguing that Einstein was a bit of a moron with his daft theory about the speed of light being constant for ages. Looks like I'm finally to be proven right. I'm with you on that one. I've though similar for a long while now. I wish I had put something down in writing, as now I just look like I'm just saying it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickycheese Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 Free Will. I believe the fundamental reasons that we behave in any certain manner are either 'Nature' or 'Nuture' - both being external influences that we cannot control. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barleycorn Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.4897 I've been arguing that Einstein was a bit of a moron with his daft theory about the speed of light being constant for ages. Looks like I'm finally to be proven right. Nothing in that research shows that the speed of light is not a constant. Just saying. jb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.