MrSmith Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 He should have been tried under due process of law by the new government. The new administration should already have in place a government in waiting, and a police force ready to patrol the streets. Or then again, has NATO destroyed a country without ensuring these things are in place? Again! How could these things be in place, how would the Libyan people vote for them during the battles to rid themselves of a dictator, who should the government and police be and where should they have waited. The only why these things could be on place is if the government and police weren’t Libyans and I don’t think the Libyan people would be too happy if we put police and a government in charge of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinz Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 He should have been tried under due process of law by the new government. You mean put him through due process then put a bullet in his head? "You can floss it and gloss any way you want." ....but dead is dead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poppins Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 Hugo Chavez Admits Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VideoPro Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 I see the conspiracy freaks have arrived. Quoting Lizzy Phelan, the Gaddafi paid shill who asked that loyalist soldiers at the Rixos Hotel shoot her in the leg so that she could blame western journalists. Pfffft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balpin Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 You mean put him through due process then put a bullet in his head? "You can floss it and gloss any way you want." ....but dead is dead. Yes, that is what I mean, precisely. Addition, Justice was not served here. The man should have been brought to book, and made to answer.. Too many secrets have gone with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balpin Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 How could these things be in place, how would the Libyan people vote for them during the battles to rid themselves of a dictator, who should the government and police be and where should they have waited. The only why these things could be on place is if the government and police weren’t Libyans and I don’t think the Libyan people would be too happy if we put police and a government in charge of them. You build governments in exile ready to take over when things are in place. Here we seem to have anarchy, ripe for the plucking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSmith Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 You build governments in exile ready to take over when things are in place. Here we seem to have anarchy, ripe for the plucking. I don’t think the Libyan people would be too happy about having a government built for them, they did the fighting they will want to have a say in who should be part of the new government. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balpin Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 I don’t think the Libyan people would be too happy about having a government built for them, they did the fighting they will want to have a say in who should be part of the new government. If you think this overthrow has anything to do with the Libyans you are living in cloud cuckoo land. It was orchestrated by the USA and carried out by the British and French. The Libyans had nowt to do with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erebus Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 Well read all the posts, and am amazed at how well everyone has swallowed the official media message, and I assume you will also behave like well trained and rather insecure sheep over the necessary war /intervention with Iran in the next couple of years or so. So he was just like Saddam as bad a Hitler was he? He killed his own people did he, in what, hundreds?? thousands?? Well what a upstart, amateur Gaddafi was, compared to the professionalism of the Uk and friends. We have participated in over a million dead in Iraq, smashed the country into the stone age, no reliable electricity, water, sewage, to date, as such things were useful to keep Saddam in power. We destroyed the country, and classed ourselves as heroes, and our only heroes all came home, boxed and delivered for burial. We tortured, murdered, trashed the country, ripped of the oil thanks to Blair who get a couple of million a year as a thank you retainer. We rendition people in Libya, so must have had a pretty good hold on that country, suggesting we know how to blackmail and threaten. Afghanistan is now a worse mess than before, and we continue like in Iraq, to kill civilians, well we need the target practice, they don't count for much and are more useful as targets to hone our weapons of mass destruction on, like in Iraq. We went to save civilians in Libya, but not the ones that supported Gaddafi, as they needed killing and again are good for target practice. The people we backed were killing us Brits and the Americans in Afghanistan, they fought for the Taliban. If you want links then just ask. Next the UK and the USA have in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, helped their future populations to produce generations deformed children, and polluted the cities forever, as we have drenched them in the spent nuclear fuels, called depleted uranium, that the weapons are made of, which semi the dust is inhaled by both sides, for generations to come. Forget thalidomide we have made that disaster look like child's play with the spent uranium bombs and pollution we have caused, but the populations deserve that because they are foreigners. Was Gaddafi a bad guy, well we saw him a as a threat, not to his people but to the financial industry. He wanted paying for his purest oil in gold bullion, and not worthless dollars. Well one can print dollars forever, which is what happens, sadly gold is not reproduced so easily. Has anyone read the UN report of Gaddafi, in January, that had to be buried in February? Do you know what they called him? Do you know what they thought of him before the oil grab started? Well the UN report classed him as a benevolent despot. Do you know what benevolent means, right it means mass murdered, tyrant, terrorist, and the other crap doesn’t it? You are sheep, led to believe what your superiors want you believe, think what they feed you, the tabloid zombies, congratulate yourselves on being fooled yet again, just like the Iraq lies! With a stupid population one lead them to believe anything, as they trust without question the lies, deceptions, and it makes a good distraction from you wages going down and food and everything that directly affects you going up, and the country given on a plate to the banks Doubtif the zonbies can read this far, never mind understand how brilliantly they have been deceived. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balpin Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 Erebus, You are quite right in all you say But the Sun and Daily Mail dictate public opinion in this country. Anyone who does not follow their instructions is considered a fool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.