Jeffrey Shaw Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 But it's fair to say that some quarters of the church are sympathetic with the protesters. Yes- but he's resigning. See http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-15472362 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rickiethecat Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 But it's fair to say that some quarters of the church are sympathetic with the protesters. Some quarters of the church are sympathetic with child abusers but it doesn't make it morally right! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murphy Jnr Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 Some quarters of the church are sympathetic with child abusers but it doesn't make it morally right! go away fool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 go away fool A cogent and logically well-argued post, there. Not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murphy Jnr Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 A cogent and logically well-argued post, there. Not. Point out the truth of his post and i'll retract the comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 Point out the truth of his post and i'll retract the comment. I'm neither endorsing nor challenging post #292. I'm simply pointing-out the pointlessness of your reply post #293.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rickiethecat Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 Point out the truth of his post and i'll retract the comment. The very obvious point I was making is that just because some members of the church support a cause, it doesn't make it morally right. Child abuse is morally wrong, so is violent protesters disrupting decent people trying to go about their business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murphy Jnr Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 I'm neither endorsing nor challenging post #292. I'm simply pointing-out the pointlessness of your reply post #293.. The post was ridiculous. Admittedly the church may close ranks but i doubt they sympathise with child molesters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElasticMan Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 The very obvious point I was making is that just because some members of the church support a cause, it doesn't make it morally right. Child abuse is morally wrong, so is violent protesters disrupting decent people trying to go about their business. Violent? What are you talking about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
green Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 The very obvious point I was making is that just because some members of the church support a cause, it doesn't make it morally right. Child abuse is morally wrong, so is violent protesters disrupting decent people trying to go about their business. The members who are firmly behind the protesters are the Church. The trustees and City of London whom are bankers, are firmly behind them being removed as they dont want undue attention on their ethics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.