green Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 Infra red cameras revealed that only 1 in 10 of the tents is occupied. The press didn't fly the helicopter that gathered this information, they just reported it! Wholly incorrect and i believe there are court proceedings to get them to retract it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
green Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 Wholly irrelevant, as you well know. Really? It was as irrelevant as your own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 i believe there are court proceedings to get them to retract it. So? Merely litigating proves nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rickiethecat Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 Wholly incorrect and i believe there are court proceedings to get them to retract it. And where is your proof that the 1 in 10 figure is incorrect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 Really? It was as irrelevant as your own. Not so. That trespassers falsify occupation of their shanty tent-town is the relevant point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
green Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 And where is your proof that the 1 in 10 figure is incorrect? I have many friends there. I dont need trolls such as yourselves or the right wing media to make my decisions. I have a brain. Unlike your very good self. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murphy Jnr Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 They should just make life easier for everyone and change their name to Occupy St Pauls, But at least I now know how to protest, if I have a problem with business A and they won't let me protest, I should protest at business B and disrupt them in the hope that Business A takes pity on Business B and comes round to my way of thinking. No. If YOU have a problem with business A YOU have to find a field out of the way of everyone so as not to cause an inconvenience. You're protest will then go unnoticed but you'll be happy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 See Labourers are few on anti-capitalist night shift at http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/public/profile/Fay-Schlesinger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 I have many friends there. Er, why aren't they at school/University/work? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSmith Posted October 27, 2011 Author Share Posted October 27, 2011 No. If YOU have a problem with business A YOU have to find a field out of the way of everyone so as not to cause an inconvenience. You're protest will then go unnoticed but you'll be happy I would think logic dictates that you would lawfully aggravate or inconvenience the business that you have the problem with and leave everyone else out of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.