Halibut Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 Still not answering my questions You mean the one about the protestors not moving? Why should they move? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichJay Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 You will say anything to further your cause. I personally, would rather deal with solid evidence rather than words of a stranger. Police film of heat sources versus words of stranger. Mmmmm - I know who the court would believe. Is the police film reliable evidence? This article suggests that it isn't... http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/oct/26/occupy-london-tents-rubbish-science Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
green Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 Er, why aren't they at school/University/work? We've done this already Jeffrey. Some people are working and doing this during their holidays. Some people are redundant and or have lost jobs and are going down for 2/3 days at a time. Lots of different people, doing different hours or days, dependent on there work/home committments. Read the website, its happy to tell you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 Er, why aren't they at school/University/work? Because they're protesting, silly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent Orange Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 You mean the one about the protestors not moving? Why should they move? Yes. As he/she seems pretty clued up and in touch with the protesters, I would have thought an official communication, stating the reasons why they refuse to move, would have been given. As for your question. They are on private property and have been asked to vacate it. Common sense, really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent Orange Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 Is the police film reliable evidence? This article suggests that it isn't... http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/oct/26/occupy-london-tents-rubbish-science No more reliable than some random words from someone on a forum, with no evidence to back up his claim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichJay Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 No more reliable than some random words from someone on a forum, with no evidence to back up his claim. In that case it's no more reliable than the original pictures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent Orange Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 In that case it's no more reliable than the original pictures. I was agreeing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fine line Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 Any vacant tents (of which there are many) at night should be considered litter and cleared away by the city of London authorities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichJay Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 I was agreeing Sorry, I assumed you were commenting on the link and not my question Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.