green Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Ive got to go to work now, (imagine that), but ill be sure to read all your lovely comments later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSmith Posted October 28, 2011 Author Share Posted October 28, 2011 Whose human rights are we ignoring? Please post the legal law you are quoting and who it refers to. I already told you, you just ignored it. Protocol 1, Article 1 (the substantive right of peaceful enjoyment of one's possessions which include one's home and other land. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Sleeps Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 I already told you, you just ignored it. Protocol 1, Article 1 (the substantive right of peaceful enjoyment of one's possessions which include one's home and other land. They aren't stopping anyone enjoying their land or possession. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrians Lad Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Whose human rights are we ignoring? Please post the legal law you are quoting and who it refers to. The rights of normal people trying to go about their daily business without being harrassed by the great unwashed ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSmith Posted October 28, 2011 Author Share Posted October 28, 2011 They aren't stopping anyone enjoying their land or possession. Of course they are, how can the church use the land that is occupied without trampling all over people and tents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Sleeps Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Of course they are, how can the church use the land that is occupied without trampling all over people and tents. The Human Rights Act isn't to stop trespassing. It is to stop state intervention into personal property. Source Protection of property You have the right to enjoy your property peacefully. Property can include things like land, houses, shares, licences, leases, patents, money, a pension and certain types of welfare benefits. A public authority cannot take away property or place restrictions on your use of your property without very good reason. This right applies to companies as well as individuals. Example If a public authority plans to build a road over someone’s land, it must have laws in place to let it do this. It must also have a procedure to check that a fair balance has been struck between the public interest in building the road and the individual’s right to their land. (Example taken from Human rights, human lives, Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2006.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Our country IS democratic ,you have the right to vote dont you ?,but if your break the law ,you must be ready to feel the full force of it . You have been asked nicely to leave ,you have chosen to ignore that polite requset ,so now you will feel the full weight of the law when you are removed against your will . Thats how democracy works. So to summarise: comply with the law or you get your skull cracked! Doesn't sound much like democracy to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stan Tamudo Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 So to summarise: comply with the law or you get your skull cracked! Doesn't sound much like democracy to me. We've heard it all before mate. The rights of normal people trying to go about their daily business without being harrassed by the great unwashed ? just a point about those unwashed tree huggers thinking they can disrupt the daily lives of everyone else Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrians Lad Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 So to summarise: comply with the law or you get your skull cracked! Doesn't sound much like democracy to me. When these anarchists turn violent towards authority( IE, the police) , the police have to fight fire with fire to restore order and deal with the violent anarchists. You see , every time these poeple turn up to support some worthless cause , they will say they are there in peace and are non violent ,but in the end they ALWAYS turn violent towards the police when they are evicted. They are so predictable. So to summarise ,yes if these people commit violent acts towards the police , they deserve everything they get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSmith Posted October 28, 2011 Author Share Posted October 28, 2011 The Human Rights Act isn't to stop trespassing. It is to stop state intervention into personal property. Source Protection of property You have the right to enjoy your property peacefully. Property can include things like land, houses, shares, licences, leases, patents, money, a pension and certain types of welfare benefits. A public authority cannot take away property or place restrictions on your use of your property without very good reason. This right applies to companies as well as individuals. Example If a public authority plans to build a road over someone’s land, it must have laws in place to let it do this. It must also have a procedure to check that a fair balance has been struck between the public interest in building the road and the individual’s right to their land. (Example taken from Human rights, human lives, Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2006.) Looks like I was wrong so we will have to go with this one, A private nuisance is an interference with a person's enjoyment and use of his land. The law recognizes that landowners, or those in rightful possession of land, have the right to the unimpaired condition of the property and to reasonable comfort and convenience in its occupation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.