fruitisbad Posted October 29, 2011 Share Posted October 29, 2011 pointless authority oh yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted October 29, 2011 Share Posted October 29, 2011 Do you have proof of that ? I ask again , do you expect police to just stand there whilst violent anarchists are hurling bricks at them . ? ( IE, the recent violence aimed at police at DALE FARM) I expect the police and bailiffs to be provocative and confrontational. I will be disappointed if the protestors react to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSmith Posted October 29, 2011 Author Share Posted October 29, 2011 I expect the police and bailiffs to be provocative and confrontational. I will be disappointed if the protestors react to them. I would expect the police to ask the protesters to move on; I imagine the protesters will refuse. At this point I’m not sure how you would expect the police to do their job without a confrontation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted October 29, 2011 Share Posted October 29, 2011 I would expect the police to ask the protesters to move on; I imagine the protesters will refuse. At this point I’m not sure how you would expect the police to do their job without a confrontation. As much as you might fantasise about a confrontation there will only be one if the police create one. There is no need for them to create one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrians Lad Posted October 29, 2011 Share Posted October 29, 2011 As much as you might fantasise about a confrontation there will only be one if the police create one. There is no need for them to create one. As in the Dale Farm case . the removal orders were issued by the courts ,the protesters and travellers HAD to leave . The protesters REFUSED to leave peacefully and defied a legal court order . Now because of their defience of the law and court order ,the anarchists left the police with no choice but to remove them forcefully. The police didnt create a confrontation ,the protesters forced a confrontation by refusing to comply with a court order ordering them to go ,leaving the police with NO choice but to take the action the did. Anarchists always defy court orders ,meaning they will always have to be removed forcefully by the police acting on a court order. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSmith Posted October 29, 2011 Author Share Posted October 29, 2011 As much as you might fantasise about a confrontation there will only be one if the police create one. There is no need for them to create one. What kind of answer is that, I don't fantasise about anything, you expect the police and bailiffs to be provocative and confrontational, I just want to know how you expect them to do their job and move the protesters if they refuse to move. Simple question even you should be able to answer it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted October 29, 2011 Share Posted October 29, 2011 What kind of answer is that, I don't fantasise about anything, you expect the police and bailiffs to be provocative and confrontational, I just want to know how you expect them to do their job and move the protesters if they refuse to move. Simple question even you should be able to answer it. How do you know the protestors will refuse if they are issued with a legal order? You're assuming they will but how do you know for sure? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted October 29, 2011 Share Posted October 29, 2011 As in the Dale Farm case . the removal orders were issued by the courts ,the protesters and travellers HAD to leave . The protesters REFUSED to leave peacefully and defied a legal court order . Now because of their defience of the law and court order ,the anarchists left the police with no choice but to remove them forcefully. The police didnt create a confrontation ,the protesters forced a confrontation by refusing to comply with a court order ordering them to go ,leaving the police with NO choice but to take the action the did. Anarchists always defy court orders ,meaning they will always have to be removed forcefully by the police acting on a court order. You're fantasising again. The protestors are not violent anarchists. Most of the protesters at Dale Farm were people losing their homes. Anyway, this isn't Dale Farm and no legal orders have been issued yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrians Lad Posted October 29, 2011 Share Posted October 29, 2011 How do you know the protestors will refuse if they are issued with a legal order? You're assuming they will but how do you know for sure? We dont know for sure ,but anarchists have a proven track record of refusing to leave peacefully ,even when a court order is issued. the evicton is the chance for them to provoke police into a confrontation ,so they can scream "police brutality" . its how anarchists work . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSmith Posted October 29, 2011 Author Share Posted October 29, 2011 How do you know the protestors will refuse if they are issued with a legal order? You're assuming they will but how do you know for sure? you expect the police and bailiffs to be provocative and confrontational, I just want to know how you expect them to do their job and move the protesters if they refuse to move. I said if, can't you read now or can't you answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.