MrSmith Posted October 29, 2011 Author Share Posted October 29, 2011 It's only an if. We don't know what will happen for sure. I'm hoping for the best on all sides. I hope the police don't resort to using force. I hope the protest can continue in another form if needed. A lot of water to go under the bridge though. I hope the protesters move and the police won't need to use force, it would have been better if they moved without the need for it to go to court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted October 29, 2011 Share Posted October 29, 2011 I haven't said it will be. All I asked is what if. If the police have to enforce a legal order they might sometimes need to use force. I hope it doesn't come to that. It would be disasterous. I would not be enjoying the idea or looking forward to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted October 29, 2011 Share Posted October 29, 2011 I hope the protesters move and the police won't need to use force, it would have been better if they moved without the need for it to go to court. I can't agree with that. The protestors are doing an important job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSmith Posted October 29, 2011 Author Share Posted October 29, 2011 I can't agree with that. The protestors are doing an important job. Camping is very important. I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrians Lad Posted October 29, 2011 Share Posted October 29, 2011 I can't agree with that. The protestors are doing an important job. What , obstructing the public highways ? Yeah ,very important . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted October 29, 2011 Share Posted October 29, 2011 Camping is very important. I agree. Good for you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSmith Posted October 29, 2011 Author Share Posted October 29, 2011 The bit I’m not sure about. It appears the police were entitled to move the protesters from the Stock Exchange, the police would have moved the protesters from St Pauls if the Dean hadn’t stopped them. So why do the police now need a court order to move them on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted October 29, 2011 Share Posted October 29, 2011 What , obstructing the public highways ? Yeah ,very important . I know you don't agree with it. I won't lose any sleep though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted October 29, 2011 Share Posted October 29, 2011 The bit I’m not sure about. It appears the police were entitled to move the protesters from the Stock Exchange, the police would have moved the protesters from St Pauls if the Dean hadn’t stopped them. So why do the police now need a court order to move them on. Didn't they already have an injunction in place for the stock exchange. Think the police simply enforced it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted October 29, 2011 Share Posted October 29, 2011 Didn't they already have an injunction in place for the stock exchange. Think the police simply enforced it. No injunction needed. It's private property and the owners said the protesters were not welcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.