love_rat Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 NOw first of all, I think Gloria (who is on tonights show) is absolutely stunning. I also think that its is more pleasing on the eye to have a stunner rather than some balding middle aged man. However. Over the last few weeks, all the candidates that labour have sent onto the show have been very weak, they seem incapable of answering any questions, don't appear to be able to connect with the common person and seem hopelessly out of their depth. HOw can milliband hope to make any impact on the british public, when he sends candidates onto question time that are weak? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
green Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 With the exception of IDS they were all horrific. Gloria spent too much time talking about herself and less answering the questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 The general British public doesn't watch Question Time and will never notice. Those who are interested in politics, are unlikely to be taken in by clever oratory over good (at least, what they believe to be good) policies, so I'm not sure it really makes a lot of difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sibon Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 It was car crash TV. I haven't seen a worse performance since N**k Gr****n. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andygardener Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 Because dire as the young lady was she did no worse job than any of the shadow cabinet would have. Labour are a busted flush. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chem1st Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 Perhaps she'd gain more votes for labour with a red bra and panties adorned with a hammer and sickle, shaking her booty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prospective Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 The UKIP guy was good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANGELFIRE1 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 love rat, You have answered your own question, because she is a looker she is good to have on the telly. Secondly - this is the calibre of NEW LIEbours Parliamentarians, not worth diddly squat as serious politicians. The Con/Dems are just as bad. Regards Angel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chem1st Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 That said though. Told Rab C proves the point that some people really are better off on dole (for the sake of society that is...); http://www.thesun.co.uk/scotsol/homepage/news/3844992/Rab-Cs-hotpants-show-his-Nesbits.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
love_rat Posted October 27, 2011 Author Share Posted October 27, 2011 Labour need to be sending candidates to the show that rattle the lib dems and the conservatives, for god sake its not that difficult to do. On the economy they could either say We intend to develop the economy by investing in manifacturing, growing small businesses etc..... etc... Or WE intend to grow our economy by giving millions to europe, investing in the public sector etc..... etc... Just say where you stand and how you intend to improve things, why be a clone of the conservatives and why not give a clear answer to any questions? I'm sure John Smith was not like this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.