Prospective Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 Life without parole if convicted, its hardley policy then. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-15529751 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 Many would say the meaning is defined by usage. .Misusage is by people who haven't a proper point so they misuse a word to strengthen a weak point. Security is security just as a mercenery is a mercenery. Simple question, when was the last security person killed, caught or actualy on patrol or in frontline combat in Afghanistan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prospective Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 Simple question, when was the last security person killed, caught or actualy on patrol or in frontline combat in Afghanistan? Never, as far as I can find. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 I'm not saying that all mercenaries do exactly the same job all the time, that would be silly. And to call a security person who is just employed as security a mercenery is not only silly but incorrect usage of the word mercenery. A mercenery in Afghanistan would be employed by the Afghani government to go out, seek and fight the the Taliban and the Pakistani trained insurgents. Have you any proof that this is happening. I'm not really intertsted in replies regarding people who are misusng the term mercenery in the context of soldiers employed by a foreign government to fight their wars as was the case in Lybia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 Simple question, when was the last security person killed, caught or actualy on patrol or in frontline combat in Afghanistan? Never, as far as I can find. Exactly, end of story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 Originally Posted by Peas Maker Agent orange you are aware that in fact mercenaries are used in these wars in Iraq and afganistan ? I'm not calling the soliders mercenaries but the hundreds of thousands of contracted killers being used by the American and our governments . But the mainstream media has conditioned the public to ignore that fact So where is your proof? Once and for all put up or shut up! If the Taleban showed as much concern as you do for human life and dignity maybe 911 wouldn't have happened. They must love it when people like you jump on the do-gooder bandwagon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harleyman Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 Here is another brainwashed example - Since when has the Taliban ever attacked us ? ( expect since after the invasion?) As for blowing up budda is that why we are now trying to remake the political structure of that country ? Westenphobe is some one who does NOT support the true princlples of freedom and democracy ! Something western governments have not done for many many years . Corporations now own and control the government - if you can see that I suffer you do a wee little more reading. You also better do better than that if you wish to accuse me of racism ! The Taleban government refused to hand over members of the terrorist group who planned and carried out the 9/11 act. The Taleban in other words were accessories to the crime. Who are these "merecenaries" you keep banging on about? Where are they from? You need to back up your statements with some fact not just repeating the same old line in every other post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peas Maker Posted November 1, 2011 Author Share Posted November 1, 2011 We bombed France and most of Europe durig the war, we sent troops into most of Europe during the war, I think it was to help and I’m sure it did help; I’m not sure how we could have helped to liberate Europe without bombing and sending troops. You cant compare Iraq , afganistan , Pakistan , Libya , Yemen and Somalia with German occupied France , All the above countries are curently being bombed and attacked by the USA and were not occupied by a forign occupation force . What do you think ? Or do you still think peace is spread by the sword ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peas Maker Posted November 1, 2011 Author Share Posted November 1, 2011 Hundreds of thousands if I read it correctly. The fact is we have hundreds of thousands of soliders and just as many mercenaries Which is a load of Westernerphobic, cobbler, claptrap. BTW what business is emplying actual mercenaries in the true sense of the word? Here is a clue when sky news uses the word Contractor in a war context It really means mercenries ! You know soliders of fortune Paid killers ? The same sort we have seen for mellineia , but on a massive scale never seen before . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 You cant compare Iraq , afganistan , Pakistan , Libya , Yemen and Somalia with German occupied France , Natos involvement in Lybia was done with the blessing of the Arab countries. Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan are awash with muslim terrorist insurgents who plan and carry out attacks all round the world, is that Ok by you, did you dance in the streets for joy as 911 happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.