I1L2T3 Posted November 7, 2011 Share Posted November 7, 2011 Not one person no, a group of them may however think different of it if one of their mob has just had his femur broken by 4 inches of plastic. So you advocate shooting people for damaging property? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ sheffield Posted November 7, 2011 Share Posted November 7, 2011 So you advocate shooting people for damaging property? You are playing with the words, remember what the last riots looked like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anna B Posted November 7, 2011 Share Posted November 7, 2011 We could put "rioters to get what they deserve". When are the people who began all this chaos going to get what they deserve? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted November 7, 2011 Share Posted November 7, 2011 You are playing with the words, remember what the last riots looked like No I'm not. I think if people are smashing things up then let them get on with it. Record them, prosecute them. Let them wreck their own futures. But shooting no. If you had framed the question around baton round usage when people are seriously endangering life then I would have agreed with you 100%. You have to be very careful when you use this type of language. I think the routine use of baton rounds for simply damaging property would be an absolute disaster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted November 7, 2011 Share Posted November 7, 2011 When are the people who began all this chaos going to get what they deserve? Yep. Bonuses for the bankers. Baton rounds for the students. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted November 7, 2011 Share Posted November 7, 2011 its amazing on here innit, things never change the usual protestors are scum type remarks even before the day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted November 7, 2011 Share Posted November 7, 2011 its amazing on here innit, things never change the usual protestors are scum type remarks even before the day Yeah, welcome back! Were have you been hiding? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murphy Jnr Posted November 7, 2011 Share Posted November 7, 2011 Yep. Bonuses for the bankers. Baton rounds for the students. This is England, a quick fix country, we bought the idea from America. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted November 7, 2011 Share Posted November 7, 2011 Yeah, welcome back! Were have you been hiding? here and there mostly there got fed up of the merrygo round of the same old arguements and lost mi inspiration Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ sheffield Posted November 7, 2011 Share Posted November 7, 2011 No I'm not. I think if people are smashing things up then let them get on with it. Record them, prosecute them. Let them wreck their own futures. But shooting no. If you had framed the question around baton round usage when people are seriously endangering life then I would have agreed with you 100%. You have to be very careful when you use this type of language. I think the routine use of baton rounds for simply damaging property would be an absolute disaster. I admit you make some valid points and I would not condone "routine" use against rioters. I think when they start setting fire to property then I would consider using baton rounds, although probably not the big ones we used in Northern Ireland, maybe rubber buckshot fired from shotguns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.