ricgem2002 Posted November 13, 2011 Share Posted November 13, 2011 Blair started his term with good ideas and intentions, however he ended as Thatcher did thinking he could ignore the electorate a bit like what camerons doing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grandad.Malky Posted November 13, 2011 Share Posted November 13, 2011 a bit like what camerons doing Cameron thought he could ignore his party .............. until they told him what they thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedbirdone Posted November 13, 2011 Share Posted November 13, 2011 Again, why wouldn't there be a position for someone to be employed in? Because all positions within that business would already be filled. The company has the required amount of staff to do the work that business does. It currently doesn't need to employ anymore people, resulting in no positions available. Lets switch it round, why do you think there would be a position avaliable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecky Posted November 13, 2011 Share Posted November 13, 2011 Because all positions within that business would already be filled. The company has the required amount of staff to do the work that business does. It currently doesn't need to employ anymore people, resulting in no positions available. Lets switch it round, why do you think there would be a position avaliable. Congratulations you finally got there at the 3rd attempt, difficult wasn't it? Now tell me I said a business should employ someone where there isn't a job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pinderson Posted November 13, 2011 Author Share Posted November 13, 2011 What actually is happening at the present time is that jobs that exist in the public sector are being lost. The jobs in the NHS and Councils are being cut purely to save money. There is work for them to do but the tories are hatcheting jobs nonetheless. It will lead to deaths in hospitals but the tories will see that as a positive reason to cut jobs. They will only be poorer people who die so they do not care. Their own have private healthcare as they can afford it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecky Posted November 13, 2011 Share Posted November 13, 2011 What actually is happening at the present time is that jobs that exist in the public sector are being lost. The jobs in the NHS and Councils are being cut purely to save money. There is work for them to do but the tories are hatcheting jobs nonetheless. It will lead to deaths in hospitals but the tories will see that as a positive reason to cut jobs. They will only be poorer people who die so they do not care. Their own have private healthcare as they can afford it. Ever thought the government maybe purposefully running NHS to try and justify flogging it off? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pinderson Posted November 13, 2011 Author Share Posted November 13, 2011 Ever thought the government maybe purposefully running NHS to try and justify flogging it off? I am sure that camerons cronies are looking to get their greedy , grabbing hands on it at a knockdown price. They would love to be able to sell essential health services to people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANGELFIRE1 Posted November 13, 2011 Share Posted November 13, 2011 Well done Magggie, except for closing the mines. Apart from that mistake, she rescued this country from the Unions, who were holding us to ransom and destroying our businesses by their exessive greed. Regards Angel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balpin Posted November 13, 2011 Share Posted November 13, 2011 Why not give them all free vitamins too , just in case. Why not? Do you have a problem with feeding children correctly? Incidentally, margarine was invented as a butter substitute, to enable vitamins to be given to children. Provision for children, until say, 14, should be free across the board. If parents can supply more, all well and good. But all chidren should be given free school meals, clothing, and milk, regardless of what background. Child Benefit is in place for this, I know. But all too often this goes on other, more pressing household bills. It may cost a few bob more in tax , but would anyone of us miss, say an extra 10 quid tax a month, for that is probably all it would cost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poppins Posted November 13, 2011 Share Posted November 13, 2011 Why not? Do you have a problem with feeding children correctly? Incidentally, margarine was invented as a butter substitute, to enable vitamins to be given to children. Provision for children, until say, 14, should be free across the board. If parents can supply more, all well and good. But all chidren should be given free school meals, clothing, and milk, regardless of what background. Child Benefit is in place for this, I know. But all too often this goes on other, more pressing household bills. It may cost a few bob more in tax , but would anyone of us miss, say an extra 10 quid tax a month, for that is probably all it would cost. Free meals, milk, vitamins, clothing, you're kidding, right ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.