Jump to content

A poll on attitudes to pornography


What is your view on pornography  

229 members have voted

  1. 1. What is your view on pornography

    • I am male and enjoy watching porn
      103
    • I am female and enjoy watching porn
      38
    • I am just not interested/ never watched
      31
    • I watch porn with my partner
      35
    • I am male and find porn disgusting
      10
    • I am female and find porn disgusting
      12


Recommended Posts

i agree.

 

I think we have moved away from porn though now.

 

I always find it odd that straight men like watching two lesbians but straight women (as far as I know) arn't interested in watching two guys.

 

Some are.:o

 

The faux lesbianism thing is non-threatening though isn't it? And standard format is that a man usually ends up in a menage a trois and shagging both women. It's the acceptable face of homosexuality. What I never understand is this recurring male fantasy of twin women. Incest.:gag::gag::gag:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because they're not biased.

Has he been released from bail?

The article is about cement:confused:.

That's not a good article at all. A good article would offer a balanced PoV, something that this one fails miserably to do.

Only if you're a dim, gullible bint.None of the women I know feel the way you described.:suspect:Neither are most posters on here.Sorry, but I don't see many women who look (or feel pressured to look) like "an off duty porn star". Maybe you need to look at your own insecurities rather than blame everything on "the media". Does no-one have the ability to make a decision for themselves and blindly follows what this "media" portrays?Not many women, either. Seems like it's only the extremists that are having a problem differentiating between reality and porn.

And doing your sex a disservice in the process.So you'd like to see comments censured so they don't offend your sensibilities? You'd like to see ignorance reign supreme?Only if you're deliberately looking to find causes of stress.

You seem to look for offence when there isn't anyAnd where (exactly) did this midwife say she laughed at any individual's bits? Proof indeed that you don't read what's in front of your eyes and make things up to suit your agenda.Some people throw labels around with no real thought to that which they type:|So that's a no then.Which is wrong as the "craze" is nothing to do with porn and is more to do with cleanliness and is something that both men and women partake in?You mean to stop genital lice from being spread?

Quelle surprise:clap:Which shows only your personal preference.

So, another non-answer to a valid question.Why am I not surprised?

What other uses do it perform then?Most are, which is a salient point that you seem unable to grasp.I've shaved all mine off, in honour of this thread:hihi:, or maybe it's because I'm dim and am easily lead by the porn industry:rolleyes:1,118 cases. Yep, that's quite a lot (NOT) out of a population of more than 30,000,000 adults.Stop looking for molehills to make into mountains.Strange thing there, Eastenders doesn't portray real people either.Do you think films such as the "Die Hard" series portray reality?

Nope. Deffo their issues:D.

 

Bloody hell; has cousin Charles been paying a visit or what?

Subtly misogynistic too. Remarkable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Argh. Haven't time to tonight. Will have to revisit it.

 

It may have something to do with how a woman's libido peaks at the time that she ovulates, in order to maximise that fertility window, and her behaviour may reflect this, making her performance seem far more naturally erotic rather than manufactured. As the pill suppresses ovulation, a woman's libido will remain more static so her 'dance' less erotically charged?

 

I hadn't considered that aspect and it's certainly a very plausible explanation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some are.:o

 

The faux lesbianism thing is non-threatening though isn't it?

But why? It could be seen as quite threatening to the male porn consumer insofar as it renders the male 'surplus to requirement'.

 

And standard format is that a man usually ends up in a menage a trois and shagging both women.

Occasionally. If a male will be in the scene, he's usually there from the start, participating.

 

It's the acceptable face of homosexuality.
... Whilst also being the most 'heterosexual choice' of viewing for the heterosexual male consumer. Two women = twice the eye candy. Male + female = having to look at hairy backsides etc. :D Besides, we all know that most male porn stars are bi-sexual / gay for pay / ladyboy enthusiasts / gayer than Christmas (delete where appropriate). Not all male porn consumers want to watch a couple of blokes bits clashing as they give some starlet far too hard a seeing-too.

 

Perhaps the reason that 'faux' lesbian scenes are the 'acceptable face of homosexuality' is because they don't contain the 'back-door' work and associated coprophilia that is becoming increasingly prevalent in mainstream heterosexual porn and which is par-for-the-course in gay porn. Nor do the lesbian scenes aimed at hetero male audiences display any significant misogyny compared to contemporary straight porn which is getting nasty again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But they know more than anyone what real lesbians look like. My friend who was the greatest critic is very femme. There was a UK version, the name escapes me, which a friend of mine was a scriptwriter for. I think that got panned by the critics.
Ok, I've done my research, I now understand all this feminism stuff.

 

andrea_dworkin.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But why? It could be seen as quite threatening to the male porn consumer insofar as it renders the male 'surplus to requirement'.

 

 

Occasionally. If a male will be in the scene, he's usually there from the start, participating.

 

... Whilst also being the most 'heterosexual choice' of viewing for the heterosexual male consumer. Two women = twice the eye candy. Male + female = having to look at hairy backsides etc. :D Besides, we all know that most male porn stars are bi-sexual / gay for pay / ladyboy enthusiasts / gayer than Christmas (delete where appropriate). Not all male porn consumers want to watch a couple of blokes bits clashing as they give some starlet far too hard a seeing-too.

 

Perhaps the reason that 'faux' lesbian scenes are the 'acceptable face of homosexuality' is because they don't contain the 'back-door' work and associated coprophilia that is becoming increasingly prevalent in mainstream heterosexual porn and which is par-for-the-course in gay porn. Nor do the lesbian scenes aimed at hetero male audiences display any significant misogyny compared to contemporary straight porn which is getting nasty again.

 

I'm not as au fait with porn as you!

 

The male is not really surplus to requirement, he is usually the voyeur, getting off on the scene before him before entering stage left.

 

If coprophilia is not to people's tastes then change to a different more vanilla type of porn is my advice. I totally take your point (and it's one that I had never considered before) about the lesbian scenes not being misogynistic. Food for thought, thanks for that, it's thought provoking which is refreshing after some of the rubbish posted on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Porn is indeed responsible for contemporary female shaving

 

You claimed porn was responsible as it allowed a better camera shot, which is wrong (a lie, even).

 

15+ years ago, it was not de rigueur to shave

 

Neither is it now. Some people do, most don't.

 

And standard format is that a man usually ends up in a menage a trois and shagging both women.

 

Depends on the porn you're watching.

 

It's the acceptable face of homosexuality.

 

It may appear that way for you.

 

What I never understand is this recurring male fantasy of twin women.

 

Only by a few.

 

Incest.:gag::gag::gag:

 

I think you're watching some weird ****.

 

Bloody hell; has cousin Charles been paying a visit or what?

 

Why would your cousin Charles be visiting me?:confused:

 

Subtly misogynistic too.

 

So, I hate women simply because I have a differing opinion to a whacked out extremist? Wow, that's such tremendous logic.:loopy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.