Supertramp Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 Should be capped at 2 kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ampersand Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 No you just wouldn't get benefits for more than 4 kids... but why 4? why not 3 or 5 or 2? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 but why 4? why not 3 or 5 or 2? Why not 4..it's an arbitrary number just like a lot of benefit related stuff..why £53 for jobseekers etc etc.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conrod Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 Your right, this will never be allowed to happen. Any party that dared put this one forward would be trounced at the elections. Would they? Don't you think the benefit scroungers with 5+ kids would already be voting Labour anyway? It's hardly going to be a policy to upset normal working people whose taxes support feckless young mothers and families in their excessive breeding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conrod Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 Should be capped at 2 kids.At the very most, and only for people who had their kids while working. Thoise who irresponsibly and selfishly choose to have kids while they're on benefits shouldn't get a penny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
love_rat Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 Would they? Don't you think the benefit scroungers with 5+ kids would already be voting Labour anyway? It's hardly going to be a policy to upset normal working people whose taxes support feckless young mothers and families in their excessive breeding. Think about it. The conditions of the past 15 years has allowed the feckless to thrive, while the working counterparts have had to tighten belts and only have kids they can afford. Many working people are childless. The feckless have been allowed to thrive, migrants have come into the country and they have thrived. Many of these kids will be adults in a few years. So we have more voting adults from a feckless background and very few people from a working class background. (give it about 5 years) These voting adults are not going to vote for a party that is going to leave them up the creak withoutr a paddle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alien52 Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 Lets get back to Victorian values,what's wrong with starving children ? If it's good enough for the Horn of Africa it's good enough for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 Lets get back to Victorian values,what's wrong with starving children ? If it's good enough for the Horn of Africa it's good enough for us. You reckon there should be benefits for as many kids as a mother wants to have... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSmith Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 Have to agree with her,if you are on benefits and want big families don't expect the taxpayer to pay for it. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-15790806 I wouldn't want to deprive the unemployed from have children (thinking about yes I would.)but I think after two their benefits should go down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGuy Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 You reckon there should be benefits for as many kids as a mother wants to have... Forgive Alien52, he's from Rotherham, bless him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.