Chun Li Posted November 19, 2011 Share Posted November 19, 2011 You'd be wrong then. It is new forensic evidence. How reliable is this new evidence though and why did it take so long to come to light? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Sidney Posted November 19, 2011 Author Share Posted November 19, 2011 i never said they were were guilty cos of it, i mentioned theyd boasted cos he originally said that they never once mentioned the crime I may be wrong but I can't remember ever seeing this. Do you have a link?.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted November 19, 2011 Share Posted November 19, 2011 why did it take so long to come to light? Advances in forensic science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chun Li Posted November 19, 2011 Share Posted November 19, 2011 Advances in forensic science. Thanks .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted November 19, 2011 Share Posted November 19, 2011 I may be wrong but I can't remember ever seeing this. Do you have a link?.. no just what i remember (or thought i remembered) from years and years ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Sidney Posted November 19, 2011 Author Share Posted November 19, 2011 It seems that some don't believe anything the police say in relation to the Mark Duggan affair but the same people believe everything the police say in relation to the Stephen Lawrence affair..Can anyone explain why this is?... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glamrocker Posted November 19, 2011 Share Posted November 19, 2011 Thought you might! And the reason for your statement .I didnt make the laws of this country but the law says, in laymans terms,if there is doubt you dont convict.I feel for the family of Stephen Lawrence but this should have been put to bed a long time ago and my opinion is that these two cannot get a fair trial because of all the ensuing publicity so instead of just trying to be clever perhaps you would like to add your opinion on whether a fair trial is possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wednesday1 Posted November 19, 2011 Share Posted November 19, 2011 And the reason for your statement .I didnt make the laws of this country but the law says, in laymans terms,if there is doubt you dont convict.I feel for the family of Stephen Lawrence but this should have been put to bed a long time ago and my opinion is that these two cannot get a fair trial because of all the ensuing publicity so instead of just trying to be clever perhaps you would like to add your opinion on whether a fair trial is possible. You're just soooo predictable Bangy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glamrocker Posted November 19, 2011 Share Posted November 19, 2011 sigh well done for dragging the thread well of topic but thats what you wanted wasnt it? the right cant stand the stephen lawrence trials either then or now, you will do ANYTHING to deny it was a white mob on an innocent black guy murder Of course it was a white mob that committed this crime but from what Iv seen on the daily news reports its going to be very hard to pin down the actual murderer/s there seems to be gaping holes in the prosecution ,granted I have not heard all the evidence so I may be incorrect,I still feel though that these two may get off on a technicality,I hope of they did it ,Im wrong but whatever the outcome im sure we will not have heard the last of this terrible affair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glamrocker Posted November 19, 2011 Share Posted November 19, 2011 You're just soooo predictable Bangy! Your opinions please or dont you have any. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.