gnvqsos Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 Is clearly rubbish as bullets do not swim. Many fish can't swim but crawl along the bottom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnvqsos Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 I was referring, as you know, to your childlike fondness for smilies. I am as right as rain now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conrod Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 Boil your face for soup.Ah, point reinforced Mr H, in your inimitable style. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 I would like to receive a complete question;your post lacks a subject and cannot be addressed at present. Maybe you're not familiar with how conversation works. But you've supplied the subject about which Halibut is asking you. I think weak people who become dependent might be vulnerable. Vulnerable to what? If you can't follow that then you should probably stop trying to engage in debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnvqsos Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 Cheers Cyclone-thanks for the tip Merry Xmas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnvqsos Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 Maybe you're not familiar with how conversation works. But you've supplied the subject about which Halibut is asking you. If you can't follow that then you should probably stop trying to engage in debate. Drugs and their addictive qualities,dealers,crime,economic deprivation,psychosis,paranoia,amnesia,and various other features. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 Part of your answer is circular. You think that weak people who might become dependant are vulnerable to the addictive qualities of drugs. That statement is redundant surely as they couldn't become dependant if some drugs weren't addictive. The dealers, crime and economic deprivation are surely what would be removed by legalisation, so the risk of falling victim to those things is reduced. The medical risks that you list are dependent on the drug in question. Risks still exist, but legalisation provides a way to reduce, manage and monitor all the risks compared to a failed policy of prohibition as far as I can see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnvqsos Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 Part of your answer is circular. You think that weak people who might become dependant are vulnerable to the addictive qualities of drugs. That statement is redundant surely as they couldn't become dependant if some drugs weren't addictive. The dealers, crime and economic deprivation are surely what would be removed by legalisation, so the risk of falling victim to those things is reduced. The medical risks that you list are dependent on the drug in question. Risks still exist, but legalisation provides a way to reduce, manage and monitor all the risks compared to a failed policy of prohibition as far as I can see. I think you are right about the circular bit-I just couldnt get my head round it at the time.Your way of thinking is far more lateral-I bet you have A-level Maths and hold all the aces.You have a distinct advantage with such an esteemed qualification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonzo77 Posted December 19, 2011 Author Share Posted December 19, 2011 They are alive but hardly creative anymore-Ozzy Osborne,Rick Wakeman,Bill Wyman,and Graham Bonzo Bond! All the people that you list are now self confessed clean living people. Funny how the creativity stops with the drug use. By the way, Ozzy was never creative, it was the other band members that breathed life into Black Sabbaths' work. He just writ the crap lyrics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonzo77 Posted December 19, 2011 Author Share Posted December 19, 2011 I think you are right about the circular bit-I just couldnt get my head round it at the time.Your way of thinking is far more lateral-I bet you have A-level Maths and hold all the aces.You have a distinct advantage with such an esteemed qualification. All the points in Cyclone's post are true. Some have already been proven by other states. Legalisation will happen, especially for cannabis and cocaine and it will happen sooner than you think, within our life time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.