max Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 No, we keep them because of well-meaning misguided policymakers. No, we keep them because they use the same laws that protect you and I from this and every other state. Remove their rights and you remove mine and yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 So you don't want anyone extraditing anywhere, then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 So you don't want anyone extraditing anywhere, then? did he say that? no he said they use laws to get out of things that also protect US from things, you cant remove it for certain people and not everybody Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 But, again, reciprocity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 did he say that? No, that's why I asked. Had he said so, I would not have asked. QED. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 But, again, reciprocity. you dont really have an arguement do you? your going round in circles already, related to bassman per chance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 No, that's why I asked. Had he said so, I would not have asked. QED. no what you did was try to put words in his mouth cos he gave a very good answer to your past post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 1. I can spell 'argument' correctly. 2. Please explain why Country1 has to extradite to Country2, whilst Country2 does not have to extradite to Country1. 3. Until you can, satisfactorily, please don't bother posting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 no what you did was try to put words in his mouth cos he gave a very good answer to your past post No, merely an answer that met your own low standard of logic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 1. I can spell 'argument' correctly. 2. Please explain why Country1 has to extradite to Country2, whilst Country2 does not have to extradite to Country1. 3. Until you can, satisfactorily, please don't bother posting. 1: attack the arguement not the poster 2: i already have 3: **** off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.