B2 Spirit Posted November 22, 2011 Author Share Posted November 22, 2011 Indeed. But of gap of getting on for 2 millennia makes the argument a nonsense. Should Rome have dibs on London because they owned it 2000 years ago? You seem to be struggling with the concept that Jews had a permanent presence in Judea. Whilst their numbers were reduced due to being scattered by the Romans, the breeding rates of Arabs does not constitute ownership. Jews were there long before Islam and much longer before the name 'palestine' was artificially created. And to the "Palestine is a modern invention" person - it goes back a thousand years before christ, but, y'know, don't let facts get in the way of a good yarn. It was a fabricated name created by the Romans to erase Jewish connection to the land. Why do you think the land was called JUDEA? it's derived from Jews/Judaism. 'palestinians' as a national identity was created after the 1967 war. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSmith Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 Indeed. But of gap of getting on for 2 millennia makes the argument a nonsense. Should Rome have dibs on London because they owned it 2000 years ago? And to the "Palestine is a modern invention" person - it goes back a thousand years before christ, but, y'know, don't let facts get in the way of a good yarn. If your argument is that it shouldn’t go back to its previous owner then Israel should keep it because they own it now. We are also probably the descendants of those that conquered the UK, so technically the UKs conquers still own the UK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAMALOCHA! Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 The State of Israel existed long before Jordon and yes there are 2000 year old maps to prove it and its even named in a 3000 year old book. Jordon is the same age as modern Israel they were formed at the same time, Jordon for the Arabs and Israel for the Jews. How about aborigines and red indians they owned there land 50,000 years ago according to carbon dating (give or take a few days). do you think they should claim back australia and USA as are israeli khazar converts ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAMALOCHA! Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 It is an egyptian word translated form hieroglyphs, actually. The word existed before the foundation of rome. In fact, the first use of the word that palestine is derived from pre-dates the original existence of Israel... Ha touche cheers never new that, come on here after ages and you learn something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Total Chaos Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 I dunno, why are muslims continually trying to take over the entire world? Wondered how long the poor old Muslims would be brought in to it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B2 Spirit Posted November 22, 2011 Author Share Posted November 22, 2011 It is an egyptian word translated form hieroglyphs, actually. The word existed before the foundation of rome. In fact, the first use of the word that palestine is derived from pre-dates the original existence of Israel... You do realise 'Peleset' bares no relation to the 'palestinians' as a people. Right? Tell me you know that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Total Chaos Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 Which countries have the Muslims invaded? England Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGuy Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 Its about time people got it through their skulls that these fangled "palestinians" are, in the main, Egyptians, Jordanian's and Syrian's, and they have"homelands", namely Egypt, Jordan and Syria. Because of your obsession with anti-capitalism and a longing to overthrow western, particularly American, Christian and capitalist values, you pro "palestinian" lot have forsaken all your democratic, feminist and anti-homophobic values by chosing to back this fangled "palestinian" cause against the democratic, tolerant Israel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAMALOCHA! Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 Its about time people got it through their skulls that these fangled "palestinians" are, in the main, Egyptians, Jordanian's and Syrian's, and they have"homelands", namely Egypt, Jordan and Syria. Because of your obsession with anti-capitalism and a longing to overthrow western, particularly American, Christian and capitalist values, you pro "palestinian" lot have forsaken all your democratic, feminist and anti-homophobic values by chosing to back this fangled "palestinian" cause against the democratic, tolerant Israel. how about khazar converts ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Dome Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 Because of your obsession with anti-capitalism and a longing to overthrow western, particularly American, Christian and capitalist values, you pro "palestinian" lot have forsaken all your democratic, feminist and anti-homophobic values by chosing to back this fangled "palestinian" cause against the democratic, tolerant Israel. They're almost all pro-nuclear too. Quite a scary and dangerous bunch, and all because they just want to get one over on the Jews. Frightening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.