ryder8904 Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 No lives should ever have been sacrificed over a bit of land in the first place. I agree, but the Argies asked for it last time. Now they are using the Fawklands as a distraction for their current governments failings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnvqsos Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 I'm not sure of your English, "when you cannot refer to mantras espoused by the Daily Mail"? What does that actually mean? As for infantile you started off sensible, hand wringingly wet but with a serious viewpoint until you said the following nonsense: Post 590 "Do you and your imperialist friends have any better ideas?" Cheesy. I cannot make it any clearer without even more dumbing down-as I said it is clear you did not study English.Do they offer construction at university these days? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxmaximus Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 What exactly is stationed there now that requires such a level of force to take, that it guarantees that the same force could hold them against a carrier battle group? RAF mount pleasant. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17157373 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marx Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 I agree, but the Argies asked for it last time. Now they are using the Fawklands as a distraction for their current governments failings. And Thatcher gave it to them. Nothing like a good war for that 'feelgood factor'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tattoo Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 I was in the Falklands and the war was not over a bit of land as you said read up in a history book Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marx Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 I was in the Falklands and the war was not over a bit of land as you said read up in a history book What was it over then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Prime Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 I cannot make it any clearer without even more dumbing down-as I said it is clear you did not study English.Do they offer construction at university these days? You're just talking crap, out of nowhere you're upset that I can't refer to mantras from the Daily Mail. Why would I want to? Your English implies that I should be able to refer to these mantras. For a man with Millie Tant phrases and an approach to the Falklands seconded by nobody you're very confident, despite having little to be confident about. Get some support on here and you might have reason to be. Post 590, one of the worst on Sheffield Forum ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obelix Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 No the bit you missed, is that it took no effort for the Argentineans to occupy the Falklands in 1982, it will take significantly more effort now because of our increased defence capabilities, and if they could somehow muster up the resources to overcome our defences, which they can’t, then a couple of carriers wouldn’t be much help in taking them back. ---------- Post added 03-01-2013 at 18:42 ---------- It is independent; we are just its protectorate. Because of course, they didn't spend time reinforcing in 82 now did they.... ---------- Post added 03-01-2013 at 23:29 ---------- Nope, I was there the first time and believe me if Argentina had the capability to take the Falkland’s now, they would have the capability to defend them. Yeah sure you were... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnvqsos Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 You're just talking crap, out of nowhere you're upset that I can't refer to mantras from the Daily Mail. Why would I want to? Your English implies that I should be able to refer to these mantras. For a man with Millie Tant phrases and an approach to the Falklands seconded by nobody you're very confident, despite having little to be confident about. Get some support on here and you might have reason to be. Post 590, one of the worst on Sheffield Forum ever. I think you are under the impression a mantra is either a form of sexual practice or a new car in the Ford economy range.Why keep referring to Millie Tant as I cannot find any reference to her on the net,unless she is your sweetheart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcleod Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 And Thatcher gave it to them. BITCH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.