Bobgok23 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 I followed the two links at the start of the video too. Three exellent videos, very informative. Yes they are, great videos, nice to hear the truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norbert Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Would it be too late to move the Jewish homeland to somewhere like Newfoundland or Kamchatka? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lab-rat Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 So someone takes over you're house because years ago it belonged to them or was promised to them by God and then you are told to go and integrate with other whites in a white country and forget about you're house! You wouldn't stand for it so neither should the Palestinians. Same situation in Northern Cyprus in about 1973-74 but otherway around? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Dome Posted December 9, 2011 Author Share Posted December 9, 2011 These are brilliantly explained. I recall earlier this year Mr Erekat, steam coming out his ears condemned the one on the West Bank (without explaining any of his reasons for the condemnation). Mr Ayalon challenged him to a public debate. You can guess what the answer was - to which Mr Ayalon noted "Palestinians only know how to debate unilaterally". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mj.scuba Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 These are brilliantly explained. I recall earlier this year Mr Erekat, steam coming out his ears condemned the one on the West Bank (without explaining any of his reasons for the condemnation). Mr Ayalon challenged him to a public debate. You can guess what the answer was. After watching those videos, it makes perfect sense. Occupied land? Nope! It's Disputed Territory! On the refugee side, how could Israel ever be expected to allow the return of thousands of people who are opposed to its very existance and actively support its destruction? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chorba Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 ...................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobgok23 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Surely SF has no members who're obsessively anti-Israel? Whoever could you mean? Delete button hot tonight:| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 So someone takes over you're house because years ago it belonged to them or was promised to them by God and then you are told to go and integrate with other whites in a white country and forget about you're house! You wouldn't stand for it so neither should the Palestinians. What about all the jews displaced by Arabs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Difference in a council house is you don't own it, some of the land stolen by Israel ie illegal settlements were people homes paid for by themselves as Palestine doesn't have council housing. You can't kick people out of their homes/land and expect them to just walk away. Somebody takes my home away without paying I would kill them regardless of the consequences, what you say above you wouldn't do yourself ie just walk away so why should the palestinians? What about all the Arab countries where the jews were kicked out of? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 I did own it, and the Jews did just that and got on with their lives. Again you avoid the fact that more Jews were displaced than Muslims. Don't let the the truth get in the way of an anti Jewish rant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.