denlin Posted December 11, 2011 Share Posted December 11, 2011 Looks like a throw back to the 1800s. Another waste of time, effort, energy and money. Pointless exercise in self promotion. I hope the hag falls overboard. Not since the 80s. Is that the 1880's?:hihi: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobgok23 Posted December 11, 2011 Share Posted December 11, 2011 Looks like a throw back to the 1800s. Another waste of time, effort, energy and money. Pointless exercise in self promotion. I hope the hag falls overboard. Not since the 80s. Disgusting comment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnvqsos Posted December 11, 2011 Share Posted December 11, 2011 What the hell are you talking about? Prince Charles was born in 1948 so he was born out of wedlock according to you and so was Princess Anne (1950). I suggest you check your facts my friend. The Queen was married in 1947, acceeded to throne in 1952 and the coronation was in 1953. I'm no royalist and thinlk we're gouing to paying twice here somehow. Now that you have corrected me in a paremptory fashion that would be futile.I dont mind funding a day out for the windsors as it will earn much for the UK,and restore our damaged international prestige. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denlin Posted December 11, 2011 Share Posted December 11, 2011 Now that you have corrected me in a paremptory fashion that would be futile.I dont mind funding a day out for the windsors as it will earn much for the UK,and restore our damaged international prestige. :hihi::hihi: It'll take more than that to restore our prestige and tha'll be paying twice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellabobby Posted December 11, 2011 Share Posted December 11, 2011 Why are you people using French to discuss this subject,. Surely you should be using German. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emma royd Posted December 11, 2011 Share Posted December 11, 2011 Why are you people using French to discuss this subject,. Surely you should be using German. Why is that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denlin Posted December 11, 2011 Share Posted December 11, 2011 Why is that? Is it because her ancestry would make the queen around 6% German? Any advance on 6% ?:hihi: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellabobby Posted December 11, 2011 Share Posted December 11, 2011 Why is that? I certainly mean no disrespect to Germany but I think she is from the European inbred privileged pampered and very very expensive royal family and although I have no personal animosity to her she and her family are too much of a burden on our country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnvqsos Posted December 11, 2011 Share Posted December 11, 2011 Any advance on 6% ?:hihi: That would mean a 70 kg queen weighing 11 stone would be 4.2 kg german or about 9 lbs;I would say that her head is German but she has a British torso and limbs.We may have to remove her head from coins and stamps and replace with something else which weighs 9lbs.Should such an item be tattooed for Id purposes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balpin Posted December 11, 2011 Author Share Posted December 11, 2011 Looks like a throw back to the 1800s. Another waste of time, effort, energy and money. Pointless exercise in self promotion. I hope the hag falls overboard. Not since the 80s. I dont think Thatcher will be around to attend, though it would be entertaining to see. Unfortunatly it looks as if these two wretches will see me out. What a shame, some one else will have to dance for me . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.