Bloomdido Posted December 12, 2011 Share Posted December 12, 2011 Advocacy for advocacy's sake. Eh? Let those that want to pray, pray and those that don't want to ... come in a minute later, or just hold their peace. Let's just have a secular society that doesn't invoke gods before meetings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cgksheff Posted December 12, 2011 Share Posted December 12, 2011 Let those that want to meet, meet, and those that want to pray go and get it done in private without disrupting the meeting. Read the facts. The majority wish to pray and meet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted December 12, 2011 Share Posted December 12, 2011 The majority wish to pray and meet. In what way is that supposed to be relevant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloomdido Posted December 12, 2011 Share Posted December 12, 2011 Read the facts. The majority wish to pray and meet. Pray to which god? I presume there are no Muslims present. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cgksheff Posted December 12, 2011 Share Posted December 12, 2011 In what way is that supposed to be relevant? I'm sorry. I thought that this case was about one person wishing to change the traditional practices that the majority wished to continue. He was being supported by an advocacy group that saw it as an opportunity to further their cause. When councils are supposed to be about collectively organising administration for the benefit for their community, it seems that this **** stirring is not to that communities benefit. You live in Sheffield? Does your Council have prayers? I bet that at this moment, you don't even know. So why pontificate about Bideford? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cgksheff Posted December 12, 2011 Share Posted December 12, 2011 Pray to which god? I presume there are no Muslims present. Why? They have the same god as christians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloomdido Posted December 12, 2011 Share Posted December 12, 2011 I'm sorry. I thought that this case was about one person wishing to change the traditional practices that the majority wished to continue. He was being supported by an advocacy group that saw it as an opportunity to further their cause. When councils are supposed to be about collectively organising administration for the benefit for their community, it seems that this **** stirring is not to that communities benefit. You live in Sheffield? Does your Council have prayers? I bet that at this moment, you don't even know. So why pontificate about Bideford? Let's bring God in to politics. He might be able to sort out the Euro problem. Let's all pray and bring it on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloomdido Posted December 12, 2011 Share Posted December 12, 2011 Advocacy for advocacy's sake. Eh? Let those that want to pray, pray and those that don't want to ... come in a minute later, or just hold their peace. Praying won't do you no good. Fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cgksheff Posted December 12, 2011 Share Posted December 12, 2011 Praying won't do you no good. Fact. Regardless of what fantasies they may involve, many acts of cohesion serve a very good purpose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloomdido Posted December 12, 2011 Share Posted December 12, 2011 Acts of cohesion? Nazis? Paedos? Lots of cohesion, not much good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.