Antics^^ Posted February 12, 2012 Share Posted February 12, 2012 They weren't mandatory when Chelsea played QPR :huh: As for Suarez, we all know what he is but, I wonder if old whisky nose would have been quick to say anything IF his boy Ferdinand hadn't been clattered by his own man and ended up on the ground as his elbow was about to go into Suarez's head or am i the only one to notice that. Also and its only my opinion, wasn't very clever of Evra to be jumping around and inciting the crowd at the end of the match right in front of Suarez , I bet old whisky nose was ok with that, Any other country and there would have been a full blown riot going on with those actions... No just you. "Old Whisky Nose" did condemn Evra's celebrations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ugo stiglitz Posted February 12, 2012 Share Posted February 12, 2012 can't understand why anyones interested prem footballers (AKA) prima donna divis all need a slap to a man and besides Evras hardly an angel is he ? the little muppet.... ps i know they got money an fame - yawnsville ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canadablade Posted February 12, 2012 Share Posted February 12, 2012 No just you. If you get a chance to see the match again, Have a look mate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted February 12, 2012 Share Posted February 12, 2012 They weren't mandatory when Chelsea played QPR :huh: As for Suarez, we all know what he is but, I wonder if old whisky nose would have been quick to say anything IF his boy Ferdinand hadn't been clattered by his own man and ended up on the ground as his elbow was about to go into Suarez's head or am i the only one to notice that. Also and its only my opinion, wasn't very clever of Evra to be jumping around and inciting the crowd at the end of the match right in front of Suarez , I bet old whisky nose was ok with that, Any other country and there would have been a full blown riot going on with those actions... The Chelsea QPR match wasn't a Premier League match and the Terry/Ferdinand issue is ongoing, but the Suarez/Evra issue was meant to be resolved, so you're not comparing like with like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC Spyda Posted February 12, 2012 Share Posted February 12, 2012 He hasn't claimed that, so why would you expect him to have any evidence of it? Yes he has... "evra had him wrongly castigated as a racist..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbie Loving Posted February 12, 2012 Share Posted February 12, 2012 Some of us Liverpool fans aren't sticking up for him. I know, didn't say all. But it does appear to be a majority. Just seen on Sky Sports. Liverpool and Dalglish have finally issued an apology for the actions of Luis Suarez during yesterday's game with Man Utd. Dalglish also offered an apology for way he conducted himself during his post-match interview. Liverpool Managing Director Ian Ayre has today released the following statement. "We are extremely disappointed Luis Suarez did not shake hands with Patrice Evra before yesterday's game. The player had told us beforehand that he would, but then chose not to do so. "He was wrong to mislead us and wrong not to offer his hand to Patrice Evra. He has not only let himself down, but also Kenny Dalglish, his teammates and the Club. It has been made absolutely clear to Luis Suarez that his behaviour was not acceptable. "Luis Suarez has now apologised for his actions which was the right thing to do. However, all of us have a duty to behave in a responsible manner and we hope that he now understands what is expected of anyone representing Liverpool Football Club. At least they've actually seen the error of the ways of both manager and player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank ryan Posted February 12, 2012 Share Posted February 12, 2012 doesn't the home office have the power to deport or detain foreign nationals - surely suarez meets the criteria it'd be nice is suarez aplogised to evra for racially abusing him , rather to scouse FC for inconveniencing them -his defence seems to be that being a racist bigot is OK in (nazi hiding) uruguay so the good folk of manchester should put up with it. that dick alan green seems to pretty much agree with him from his comments on R5 today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted February 12, 2012 Share Posted February 12, 2012 doesn't the home office have the power to deport or detain foreign nationals - surely suarez meets the criteria He hasn't been convicted of any crimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank ryan Posted February 12, 2012 Share Posted February 12, 2012 He hasn't been convicted of any crimes. doesn't have to be - just that his presence is against the national interest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael_W Posted February 12, 2012 Share Posted February 12, 2012 doesn't the home office have the power to deport or detain foreign nationals - surely suarez meets the criteria it'd be nice is suarez aplogised to evra for racially abusing him , rather to scouse FC for inconveniencing them -his defence seems to be that being a racist bigot is OK in (nazi hiding) uruguay so the good folk of manchester should put up with it. that dick alan green seems to pretty much agree with him from his comments on R5 today Theres an interesting thought Frank, I think he would be closely followed by a lot more 'foreign nationals' who were actually guilty of something worth acting upon though, where do you stand on that ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.