Jump to content

Police may shoot rioters claim


Recommended Posts

Because they'd never shoot a man waving a table leg, would they?

 

 

Besides, if it is night, set against a backdrop of furniture shops ablaze, with noise and chaos, a wrong decision could never ever be made could it?

 

I take it he's collecting for the Red Cross waving a table leg outside a burning building then is he?

 

I'm with Clint Eastwood on that one!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well of course the Riot Act was repealed years ago but under its terms you had an hour to disperse once it was read by a magistrate. Maybe it wants bringing back.

 

It will be inoperative where those assembled are not indigenous,or are wearing ipods and hoods to muffle sounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I take it he's collecting for the Red Cross waving a table leg outside a burning building then is he?

 

I'm with Clint Eastwood on that one!

 

Are you being deliberately obtuse or what?

 

Which movie was it where Clint gunned down entirely innocent unarmed men?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Common sense to use 5.56mm NATO frangible rounds then:thumbsup:

As a shooter you will know that frangible bullets break up into small, less harmful, pieces upon contact with anything harder than they are. This maximizes the round's transfer of energy to the object and minimizes the chances that pieces of the bullet will exit the object at dangerous velocities. Each of the small fragments quickly loses any energy and therefore pose very little danger to any secondary targets. This means that full-power frangible bullets can be shot at target all the way up to muzzle contact without any worries that the bullet or case will ricochet and potentially hurt either the shooter or others.

 

 

Good post but, my .220 swift 4200 fps could on hitting grass either deflect or break up, still would not like to be on the end of the pieces to be honest. I realise the NATO round mentioned will not attain the velocity of the .220swift but the same applies, still would not relish been struck by the shrapnel of the round.

 

Angel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.