LeMaquis Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 Some people are very touchy alately, Stan Collimore has got someone arrested now for saying something on Twitter... Actually someone got himself arrested for making racist comments on twitter. Blaming Collymore for that is like saying 30 million war dead were responsible for some Nazis going on trial at Nuremburg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Sidney Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 You also said you'd gone out and recruited 3 people for the EDL even though the same paedophile in their ranks was already known about. Yes I did, they would march with the EDL for the same reason..I also said I prefer the EDL to the Taliban... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Sidney Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 Actually someone got himself arrested for making racist comments on twitter. Blaming Collymore for that is like saying 30 million war dead were responsible for some Nazis going on trial at Nuremburg. Now your just being hilarious.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Sidney Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 Actually someone got himself arrested for making racist comments on twitter. Blaming Collymore for that is like saying 30 million war dead were responsible for some Nazis going on trial at Nuremburg. Anyway I thought, you, John X, was banned... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ sheffield Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 Anyway I thought, you, John X, was banned... Outed :hihi: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeMaquis Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 Yes I did, they would march with the EDL for the same reason..I also said I prefer the EDL to the Taliban... I find it strange that you ignore the issue of the EDL having a paedophile in a senior position just because you think the Taliban are worse. Most people reject both. Being pro-EDL is a positive choice, not a default choice simply because you think they're better than another bunch of criminal crackpots. You don't have to be pro-EDL just because you're anti-something else. That's the old my enemy's enemy is my friend argument. When your enemy's enemy has a paedophile at the top that argument should fall down. If not, you're just being complacent towards paedophilia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeMaquis Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 Anyway I thought, you, John X, was banned... I'm not John X. If you want the Mods to check our internet adresses just ask them. I've never had anything to do with him, unlike you and an organisation led by a paedo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Sidney Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 I find it strange that you ignore the issue of the EDL having a paedophile in a senior position just because you think the Taliban are worse. Most people reject both. Being pro-EDL is a positive choice, not a default choice simply because you think they're better than another bunch of criminal crackpots. You don't have to be pro-EDL just because you're anti-something else. That's the old my enemy's enemy is my friend argument. When your enemy's enemy has a paedophile at the top that argument should fall down. If not, you're just being complacent towards paedophilia. I've voted Labour and Tory before, John, and hated the leadership, one votes for the party, I do anyway, so your point is not valid. Many voted for labour again last time even though Tony killed thousands in pointless wars. So by your logic anyone who voted Labour last time must have supported the killing of innocent Iraqis..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Sidney Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 I'm not John X. If you want the Mods to check our internet adresses just ask them. I've never had anything to do with him, unlike you and an organisation led by a paedo. Yes you are, you naughty boy.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Sidney Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 I find it strange that you ignore the issue of the EDL having a paedophile in a senior position just because you think the Taliban are worse. Most people reject both. Being pro-EDL is a positive choice, not a default choice simply because you think they're better than another bunch of criminal crackpots. You don't have to be pro-EDL just because you're anti-something else. That's the old my enemy's enemy is my friend argument. When your enemy's enemy has a paedophile at the top that argument should fall down. If not, you're just being complacent towards paedophilia. The Taliban V EDL argument came up because someone said they'd like to see a big fight between them. I commented to the poster that if there was a fight, I hoped the EDL would win... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.