Jump to content

Scottish Independence


A wee question of Scottish independence  

213 members have voted

  1. 1. A wee question of Scottish independence

    • I'm Scottish and I vote "YES", we should self-govern
      12
    • I'm Scottish and I vote "NO", we should stay in the UK
      9
    • I'm English, Welsh or Irish, and I vote "YES", let them go
      110
    • I'm English, Welsh or Irish, and I vote "NO", keep them in
      82


Recommended Posts

A glance at how the Irish have haircut their own public services in the past 5 years might provide a useful insight, in this context: we've had "Tories wreaking havoc"...they've had "hordes of barbarians raping, burning & pillaging".

 

Just sayin', re. greener grass, being careful about one wishes for <etc> ;)

 

Indeed. Going to be fascinating if they do vote yes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bbc bias towards a NO vote is very subtle but still clearly visible.

 

I'm was amused to see that the No campaigners have resorted to using gordon brown, ... if ever there was a man that should be up on charges for treason I think it ought to be him.

 

I think allowing him to say anything has really helped boost the yes vote.

.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever happens after the referendum, British politics wont be the same again; suppose the NO camp win and Scotland stays in the union, how, in any typical future spats in the Commons between the Tories and Labour over the economy or whatever, could the Tories have the cheek to make remarks like "Labour would wreck Britain", or "only with the Tories can Britain prosper", etc etc, when, given that Scotland is practically a Tory-free zone and has been nowhere in the independence debate, it will have been mainly Labour that rescued the union?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sending Gordon Brown up was a potentially dumb move

 

It may be a stroke of genius or a monumental mistake

 

It's hilarious that all 3 UK leaders have cancelled Q & A to campaign in Scotland tomorrow, I sense major squeaky bums now!

 

Don't forget while the majority south of the border have little time for Gordon Brown he is far more popular in Scotland itself and he is very popular with the working class voters up there.

 

They probably should have used him more in the campaign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a thought, but who gave permission for Scotland to have a referendum ?

If Scotland just decided, then why can't Northern Ireland, and if Westminster decided, then why can't they give permission to Northern Ireland ?

 

If Westminster had not allowed a referendum then Salmon would have held an unofficial one. Had he won the unofficial one then Westminster would have been in a very difficult situation. Democracy would be seen to be ignored. It was better to do it this way.

 

---------- Post added 10-09-2014 at 09:52 ----------

 

Whatever happens after the referendum, British politics wont be the same again; suppose the NO camp win and Scotland stays in the union, how, in any typical future spats in the Commons between the Tories and Labour over the economy or whatever, could the Tories have the cheek to make remarks like "Labour would wreck Britain", or "only with the Tories can Britain prosper", etc etc, when, given that Scotland is practically a Tory-free zone and has been nowhere in the independence debate, it will have been mainly Labour that rescued the union?

 

In the event of a no vote I don't see how any political party can claim any credit for "saving Britain" it is a referendum that has seen party political borders crossed. It is the people of Scotland who have either saved or ruined Britain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed. Going to be fascinating if they do vote yes
That it will.

 

For starters, whether Scotland gets carpet-bagged by international financial markets from the get-go since they won't get the £...which is my prediction.

 

Whereby they'd end up in submission to London, NY, JP <etc.> financiers as before, but to them alone without the additional clout and umbrella of No.10, the BoE, democratic representation (and safeguards) in the House of Parliament, etc.

 

As I said, a case of being careful about what one wishes for. But hey-ho. Like the man said, "you makes your choices, you lives your life" ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Westminster had not allowed a referendum then Salmon would have held an unofficial one. Had he won the unofficial one then Westminster would have been in a very difficult situation. Democracy would be seen to be ignored. It was better to do it this way.

 

---------- Post added 10-09-2014 at 09:52 ----------

 

 

In the event of a no vote I don't see how any political party can claim any credit for "saving Britain" it is a referendum that has seen party political borders crossed. It is the people of Scotland who have either saved or ruined Britain.

 

Scotland is been an equal drain on England than anything else so a YES vote could be a positive move for England.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a thought, but who gave permission for Scotland to have a referendum ?

If Scotland just decided, then why can't Northern Ireland, and if Westminster decided, then why can't they give permission to Northern Ireland ?

 

Thank's to all for the answer on this one. It's all fascinating,especially with the polls being so close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.