Strix Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 a much better arrangement would be for the council to waive his fees if he can (for instance) attract a 25% attendance on his fitness courses from underprivileged families, teens with an unfavourable history, or people diagnosed as obese by their doctor and prescribed exercise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metalman Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 Charging people to park their cars in the car park at the park, which is what our council is going to do, is a much more effective way of discouraging everyone from using the park. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sibon Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 Charging people to park their cars in the car park at the park, which is what our council is going to do, is a much more effective way of discouraging everyone from using the park. It won't discourage me. I walk there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harleyman Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16656288 Why not temporarily rent a public field/park? I could 'buy to let' a public park and charge children to play football. The council/private sector is missing out on some money here! 50p an hour each? Five a side for a fiver! How much should we charge our children to use the public parks?[/QUOTE] Nothing. There might be a future Beckham among those kids and that kid might not be able to afford it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.