JFKvsNixon Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 You reckon? It costs about £34,000 to keep someone in prison for a year multiply that by twelve or longer. Death penalty or shipping him home would be a good result in my opinion. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10412246 So you'd rather the rapist was sent to to live a free life? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric_Collins Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 You reckon? It costs about £34,000 to keep someone in prison for a year multiply that by twelve or longer. Death penalty or shipping him home would be a good result in my opinion. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10412246 A plane ticket back home to his own jail system a lot cheaper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricgem2002 Posted January 28, 2012 Author Share Posted January 28, 2012 So you'd rather the rapist was sent to to live a free life? why dont they have prisons where he comes from ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 A plane ticket back home to his own jail system a lot cheaper. Why would the Czech Republic pay to keep him in their prisons, he's committed a crime here. Throw him in prison for the rest of his life I say, I have no problem with some of my tax money being spent making sure scum like him never walk the streets again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Hardie Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 You reckon? It costs about £34,000 to keep someone in prison for a year multiply that by twelve or longer. Death penalty or shipping him home would be a good result in my opinion. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10412246 Why not send the bill to the Czech Republic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 why dont they have prisons where he comes from ? Yea, for people who've broken the laws in the Czech Republic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Why not send the bill to the Czech Republic? Why should a country at whole be made responsible for the actions one of it's individuals? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric_Collins Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Why not send the bill to the Czech Republic? Have you not seen Borat ? They will pay in goat dung or summat Nah we should bill forigen prisoners place of origin for the incovienience of housing them in our jails. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rupert_Baehr Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Great , other countries convicted killer scum free to carry out same acts on our street. Glad he's locked up non the less. Are people who have served sentences for serious offences in the UK forbidden to leave the country? Are there no British 'killer scum' free to carry out the same acts on foreign streets? (Or on British streets, for that matter.) How would you go about tightening up the control on the whereabouts of people? I've no doubt that the Border Agency do have a list of 'known scum' but it seems (this case is an example) that the list is incomplete and some people do slip through the net. Should all countries be required to provide the UKBA with full details of all convicted persons? The UK would of course have to provide details of all convictions to all foreign governments in return. - Would you care if your details were made available to all governments everywhere? Should the UK have a complete computerised database showing exactly who is in the country at any time? You would need some sort of ID card and registration system to make that work. Would that be acceptable to the average Briton (let alone the average illegal immigrant)? There were numerous complaints when microchipped passports were introduced; would there be many complaints if those passports stored full details of the holder's records? There has to be a compromise between 'security' and 'privacy'. It's up to the people to decide where the line is drawn, but it's the same line for everybody who wishes to cross it. If you make it extremely difficult for criminals to enter or leave the country, by requiring them to provide a great deal of information, you'll have to make it extremely difficult for everybody else to do so. When I enter the US, I have to produce not only my passport, but also my 'Resident Alien' card - and I have to put my finger on a fingerprint scanner. The Feds have my details (which might include my criminal record - if I had one) on a computer file. I don't consider that to be 'a gross invasion of privacy' but I'm well aware that a lot of other people would consider being on such a database to be an invasion of privacy. I'm glad this rapist has been caught - and I too hope he stays in jail for a very long time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ sheffield Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Why would the Czech Republic pay to keep him in their prisons, he's committed a crime here. Throw him in prison for the rest of his life I say, I have no problem with some of my tax money being spent making sure scum like him never walk the streets again. Its also unfortunate that you are paying some of your taxes for other scum like this to be shipped in to walk the streets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.