Jessica23 Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 no I am not nearly naked when I go swimming, I am wearing appropriate clothing yes. I suspect you want to correct Jessicas wording to "inappropriate" really. Inappropriately near-naked is fine by me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
llamatron Posted February 9, 2012 Author Share Posted February 9, 2012 Yes you are, fundamentally so. I'm going to leave the house now wearing only my socks, and then act suprised when the police stop me. "I'm not naked your honour, this is my outfit for the day." Yeah thats the same! Do you not think there is a slight difference there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
llamatron Posted February 9, 2012 Author Share Posted February 9, 2012 Inappropriately near-naked is fine by me. its not nearly naked though so you are wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Sleeps Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 Yeah thats the same! Do you not think there is a slight difference there? You caught me pre-edit. I watered down my silly point to make it sensible. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carosio Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 Bunnies are soft, and fluffy, and harmless. They are pets. This association can be seen as sexist because this draws an unfair distinction between men and women. It does this by exaggerating the idea that female sexuality is soft, fluffy and harmless - or passive and non-aggressive. It's basically a caricature of a damaging stereotype about women. / If you were asked to re-design the cartoon so that it portrayed female sexuality in a way that met your approval, would you describe what it might look like? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Sleeps Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 its not nearly naked Naked means 'wearing no clothes'. If wearing lots of clothes is 'fully clothed', then what is wearing the minimum amount of clothes? It's nearly naked. What a stupid debate. I'm not bothered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jessica23 Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 Bunnies are soft, and fluffy, and harmless. They are pets. This association can be seen as sexist because this draws an unfair distinction between men and women. It does this by exaggerating the idea that female sexuality is soft, fluffy and harmless - or passive and non-aggressive. It's basically a caricature of a damaging stereotype about women. / If you were asked to re-design the cartoon so that it portrayed female sexuality in a way that met your approval, would you describe what it might look like? Lose the bunny ears and make the body shape a bit more realistic and that'd do for me. I'm all in favour of nakedness. When appropriate, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
llamatron Posted February 9, 2012 Author Share Posted February 9, 2012 You caught me pre-edit. I watered down my silly point to make it sensible. :D That probably wouldn't be socially acceptable but its not nearly naked. I think depending on your pant type now you have put them on the police may not even be bothered! I have just seen the byline on the tap advert and its actually quite funny! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
llamatron Posted February 9, 2012 Author Share Posted February 9, 2012 Bunnies are soft, and fluffy, and harmless. They are pets. This association can be seen as sexist because this draws an unfair distinction between men and women. It does this by exaggerating the idea that female sexuality is soft, fluffy and harmless - or passive and non-aggressive. It's basically a caricature of a damaging stereotype about women. / Lose the bunny ears and make the body shape a bit more realistic and that'd do for me. I'm all in favour of nakedness. When appropriate, of course. The body shape isn't that unrealistic, not very common but shes no barbie-she looks like a swimmer! Notice how they have cut off her ass, if you see the rest of the image she has a massive ass! .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
llamatron Posted February 9, 2012 Author Share Posted February 9, 2012 Naked means 'wearing no clothes'. If wearing lots of clothes is 'fully clothed', then what is wearing the minimum amount of clothes? It's nearly naked. What a stupid debate. I'm not bothered. no it isn't its not wearing many clothes, you have covered up all the rude bits Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.