xenia Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 I dont think homosexualists should be involved in politics. They are far too emotional and unstable. Women are the same. I have my doubts about anyone who is black or brown as they are mostly criminals. Scousers are also thieves. Jewish people are all con men,In fact, Hindus and Buddhists are a bit weird and Muslims blow you up. (This is my submission for the most people offended in the shortest paragraph competition.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 I know. That's what me and a few others have been saying for twenty flipping pages. I frankly don't care one bit if Hague is gay or not, but if he was that would certainly make him the mother of all hypocrites, for there have been few fiercer campaigners against gay equality in the Commons in the last decade. Now you are saying that he should have voted for all the things mentioned before? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ferno Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Now you are saying that he should have voted for all the things mentioned before? No I'm not. Have you suffered a recent brain injury? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 No I'm not. Have you suffered a recent brain injury? So why is he a hypocrite...you're not being very clear.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister M Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 I dont think homosexualists should be involved in politics. They are far too emotional and unstable. Women are the same. I have my doubts about anyone who is black or brown as they are mostly criminals. Scousers are also thieves. Jewish people are all con men,In fact, Hindus and Buddhists are a bit weird and Muslims blow you up. (This is my submission for the most people offended in the shortest paragraph competition.) You trying to get a job with the Daily Mail, you're obviously a bit dim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mj.scuba Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Nope. If Hague were straight and had been sharing his room with an attractive young female researcher the scandal would have been as strong and it really is a public interest question if he is employing a lover. What do you get if you cross William Hague and the Pakistan Cricket Team? More ball-tampering allegations. So you are insinuating somebody is gay, because they employ a gay person? You're quite the bigot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank ryan Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Typical hypocritical tory scum. Sources who worked at the News of the World have confirmed an allegation, made at the Leveson inquiry by maverick blogger Paul Staines, that the paper paid him £20,000 to buy up a photograph of a special adviser to the foreign secretary, William Hague, which they subsequently never published. Staines's claim is potentially explosive because the now-disgraced former News of the World editor, Andy Coulson, was acting at the time as the Cameron government's press adviser, and is likely to have been involved in what proved to be a successful battle to save Hague's job. The photograph was bought at the height of a controversy about Hague sharing a hotel room during campaigns with a 25-year-old special adviser. Hague was forced to issue a detailed statement denying he had had a gay relationship, and the recently appointed adviser, Chris Myers, resigned. Staines, who runs a gossip site under the name Guido Fawkes, told Lord Justice Leveson in sworn testimony: "We also had pictures of the special adviser in a gay bar … We took the photos to the News of the World. They bought them for £20,000 and never published them. I don't know very much but I know you don't pay £20,000 for photos not to publish." He went on: "The News of the World was in regular contact with Downing Street, and perhaps to curry favour or for whatever reasons, they chose to buy up those pictures and take them off the market." News International, the owners of the defunct tabloid, declined to comment on the allegations, saying they were not prepared to disclose details of payments made. But two former executives at the paper confirmed the deal, on condition of anonymity. They said the purchase was negotiated via the paper's political staff, and authorised by the editor, Colin Myler. One source claimed Myler bought the picture in order to "keep it off the market for a week" because he was planning to expose allegations of spot-fixing at Pakistan cricket matches, and wanted it to dominate the headlines that week. But, according to Staines's testimony, he sold the photograph the week after the cricket story, which ran on Sunday 29 August 2010, along with printouts of on-line chat from a website. The following week, after a statement by Hague describing his happy marriage and denying any gay relationships, every Sunday paper bar one carried news stories about the issue, with speculation about the foreign secretary's future. The sole exception was the News of the World. http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/feb/09/news-of-the-world-guido-fawkes-hague?CMP=twt_gu the opening line sounds like you're calling me 'typical hypocritcal tory scum' I accept typical, hypocritical and scum but 'tory' - perhaps I misread it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ferno Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 So you are insinuating somebody is gay, because they employ a gay person? You're quite the bigot. Who said Christopher Myers was gay? You got any proof for that accusation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mj.scuba Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Who said Christopher Myers was gay? You got any proof for that accusation? You're the one saying Hague may have been in a homosexual relationship with his advisor (Myers). Where is your proof of this allegation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hard2miss Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 For the sixth time, I couldn't care less if they are gay. If Hague is gay normally I'd say it's his business, between him and Ffion. BUT he was absent for all votes on equalising the age of consent; voted against gays in the military; voted to retain section 28 (and put a three line whip on it - even sacking two front benchers who refused to back it); voted against gay men and women adopting children. If Coulson blocked a story and photo that would have incriminated Hague then it's a murky business indeed. Are you against Gay men then or just those who wish to keep it private and not go walking the streets with banners on Gay rights marches ? So what if he did not want to vote and highlight that he may be Gay or not, you don't have to Drive a milk float to like milk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.