Agent Orange Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 Evidence, I've provided it. Why wait 50 days? Who cares why? Pointless responding any further to 66 Why kill all those people? Answer, that was the intension. Why did they intend to kill everyone? to send a message to all the other religious sects that the state rules? The evidence is in the tactics used and all the dead. Who killed all those people? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whatwhat Posted February 17, 2012 Author Share Posted February 17, 2012 Who killed all those people? The ATF FBI the State. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent Orange Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 The ATF FBI the State. You mean, the ones that committed suicide? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whatwhat Posted February 17, 2012 Author Share Posted February 17, 2012 You mean, the ones that committed suicide? Can you expand on that? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waco_siege#Evaluation_by_FBI_of_mass_suicide_possibility Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent Orange Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 Can you expand on that? Here: Autopsy records indicate that at least 20 Davidians were shot, including five children under the age of 14. Three-year-old Dayland Gent was stabbed in the chest. The medical examiner who performed the autopsies believed these deaths were mercy killings by Davidians trapped in the fire with no escape. The expert retained by the Office of Special Counsel concluded that many of the gunshot wounds "support self-destruction either by overt suicide, consensual execution (suicide by proxy), or less likely, forced execution." Quoted from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waco_siege Further to your accusations about this being state murder, how do you explain the negotiations for surrender? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whatwhat Posted February 17, 2012 Author Share Posted February 17, 2012 Personally, I don't care. I just want Whatwhat to provide his evidence. Don't think it's going to happen. jb As I have said many times The evidence is in the dead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whatwhat Posted February 17, 2012 Author Share Posted February 17, 2012 Here: Autopsy records indicate that at least 20 Davidians were shot, including five children under the age of 14. Three-year-old Dayland Gent was stabbed in the chest. The medical examiner who performed the autopsies believed these deaths were mercy killings by Davidians trapped in the fire with no escape. The expert retained by the Office of Special Counsel concluded that many of the gunshot wounds "support self-destruction either by overt suicide, consensual execution (suicide by proxy), or less likely, forced execution." Quoted from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waco_siege Further to your accusations about this being state murder, how do you explain the negotiations for surrender? The bit you left out "I can understand why someone would end the suffering of someone, especially a child, who had been gassed and was burning to death. That makes more sense than these claims of a 'suicide pact.' The people who are saying that have never been on fire." (Las Vegas Review-Journal) Negotiations were ongoing when the state decided to commit mass murder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecky Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 The bit you left out "I can understand why someone would end the suffering of someone, especially a child, who had been gassed and was burning to death. That makes more sense than these claims of a 'suicide pact.' The people who are saying that have never been on fire." (Las Vegas Review-Journal) Negotiations were ongoing when the state decided to commit mass murder. Don't tell me you're stuck at work on a Froday afternoon, bored mindless? Get some work done you work-shy fop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent Orange Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 The bit you left out "I can understand why someone would end the suffering of someone, especially a child, who had been gassed and was burning to death. That makes more sense than these claims of a 'suicide pact.' The people who are saying that have never been on fire." (Las Vegas Review-Journal) Negotiations were ongoing when the state decided to commit mass murder. And the above quote was taken from a survivor. Not at all biased, hey?! You seem to forget that a dozen or so children were surrended to the authorities before the final assualt. Why would the state spend time negotiating if their only intention was to murder? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whatwhat Posted February 17, 2012 Author Share Posted February 17, 2012 And the above quote was taken from a survivor. Not at all biased, hey?! You seem to forget that a dozen or so children were surrended to the authorities before the final assualt. Why would the state spend time negotiating if their only intention was to murder? Why did they need to do a final assault? Answer To murder everyone. Or do you really think tanks CS gas fire and bullets would end in little or no loss of life? Waiting another 50 days or more would have saved lives, but that's not what was wanted. CS gas plus fire equals? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.