Frank Sidney Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 I've heard they were shielding an Alien from Plant X, who shot Kennedy, who was in the middle of planning a voyage to search for Atlantis.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whatwhat Posted February 17, 2012 Author Share Posted February 17, 2012 I've heard they were shielding an Alien from Plant X, who shot Kennedy, who was in the middle of planning a voyage to search for Atlantis.. The mothers had to watch there kids burn to death. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent Orange Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 Why did they need to do a final assault? Answer To murder everyone. Or do you really think tanks CS gas fire and bullets would end in little or no loss of life? Waiting another 50 days or more would have saved lives, but that's not what was wanted. CS gas plus fire equals? How could they have murdered everyone when they negotiated the surrender of a dozen or so of their members (children)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent Orange Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 The mothers had to watch there kids burn to death. Why did they have to watch? I will set fire to your child and see how you react. I bet you any money you would try to save the child. You wouldn't simply watch and do nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent Orange Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 I've heard they were shielding an Alien from Plant X, who shot Kennedy, who was in the middle of planning a voyage to search for Atlantis.. It's the lizzard people from Mars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barleycorn Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 Evidence, I've provided it. Really? I must have blinked and missed it. Why wait 50 days? Who cares why? Surely any intrepid investigoogler would want to know why. Pointless responding any further to 66 Why is it pointless? You have claimed the motive was increased funding. Without any evidence this is a baseless assertion and can be ignored. Why kill all those people? Answer, that was the intension. Why did they intend to kill everyone? to send a message to all the other religious sects that the state rules? The evidence is in the tactics used and all the dead. So, you're agreeing that we can discount the motive of funding. If they intended to kill everyone then why didn't they? jb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whatwhat Posted February 17, 2012 Author Share Posted February 17, 2012 ******** Why has there been such a cover up of the truth about Waco?* Simply put, the truth is too terrible for the American people to hear: federal agents twice attacked and murdered a total of 82 civilians, mostly women, children and the elderly–half of them people of color.* And the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of our “Constitutional Republic” let them get away with it. *All branches have a vested interest for finding federal agents innocent of all crimes–protection of their own perks and privileges. http://carolmoore.net/waco/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent Orange Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 ******** Why has there been such a cover up of the truth about Waco?* Simply put, the truth is too terrible for the American people to hear: federal agents twice attacked and murdered a total of 82 civilians, mostly women, children and the elderly–half of them people of color.* And the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of our “Constitutional Republic” let them get away with it. *All branches have a vested interest for finding federal agents innocent of all crimes–protection of their own perks and privileges. http://carolmoore.net/waco/ Ah, Carol Moore. Just looked through her back catelogue and it seems she likes a good conspiracy. I will take the above nonsense with a pinch of salt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whatwhat Posted February 17, 2012 Author Share Posted February 17, 2012 Really? I must have blinked and missed it. Surely any intrepid investigoogler would want to know why. Why is it pointless? You have claimed the motive was increased funding. Without any evidence this is a baseless assertion and can be ignored. So, you're agreeing that we can discount the motive of funding. If they intended to kill everyone then why didn't they? jb You need to read your own signature. What was in it for the ATF , more funding. What was in it for the state, more control of it's people. Why assault a stronghold full of kids the old and infirm? When all the had to do was wait it out. By the way, CS gas plus fire equals cyanide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whatwhat Posted February 17, 2012 Author Share Posted February 17, 2012 Ah, Carol Moore. Just looked through her back catelogue and it seems she likes a good conspiracy. I will take the above nonsense with a pinch of salt Hence I keep saying the dead are the evidence. Have you grasped it yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.