ricgem2002 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 Nice ambiguous statements as usual. yea but true just some people cant/wont see it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*_ash_* Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 yea but true just some people cant/wont see it I will gladly look at it if anyone can show me proof or evidence. No one has answered anything yet with any evidence of any of the points I've raised/questioned. All I've had is tabloid or politician type responses which avoid answering direct questions, by waffling on about something else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INTERVIEWER Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 There is an interesting statement, intended I believe to put pressure upon the various organisations taking advantage of the work experience schemes, being sent to the local managers, the CEO and other board members of those organisations involved, by those unwillingly forced to work for them: "I participate in this work ‘experience’ forced labour scheme only under duress, due to the threat of sanction and being reduced to a state of absolute poverty if I do not. I am not a volunteer. I am a conscript. I have no loyalty to, or respect for, any organisation which does not believe that my labour is worth the bare minimum hourly rate, the National Minimum Wage, and thus takes advantage of my economic weakness. I will participate, but under protest." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southcoast Posted March 10, 2012 Author Share Posted March 10, 2012 Labour Party now going to get tough on those out of work,seems they are trying to out do the tory party when it comes to attacking the poor ,shame on them. http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/mar/10/labour-welfare-benefits-work-programme Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.