metalman Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 If the police were required to have a quiet word with every lad over 16 who'd kissed a girl under 16, I think the country would have succumbed to a state of anarchy long before now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikita Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 Why is the blame on the 'group leader'? Why in this day and age the need to absolve all responsibility of parenting children? Behaviour for both these children and how they behave when away from home lay at their parents doorstep. I didnt say it was the fault of the group leader.I said the parent of the girl should ask the group leader,the adult in charge at the time, what the rules are regarding the boys and girls mixing at night time. She is a young girl just 5 days past her fourteenth birthday he is seventeen going on eighteen,i think that is too much an age gap at her age. As we get older the age gap dosent matter so much but in my opinion he is too old for her.But that is just my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discodown Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 Ring the police. Shes under age and hes old enough to know that. I'd love to hear that phone conversation. "My daughter consented to kiss someone" "We'll scramble the helicopter immediately!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
normansmum Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 I didnt say it was the fault of the group leader.I said the parent of the girl should ask the group leader,the adult in charge at the time, what the rules are regarding the boys and girls mixing at night time. She is a young girl just 5 days past her fourteenth birthday he is seventeen going on eighteen,i think that is too much an age gap at her age. As we get older the age gap dosent matter so much but in my opinion he is too old for her.But that is just my opinion. Where does it say that? I didn't see anywhere where it said he was nearly 18 nor did I see that he was 5 days after his 17th birthday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikita Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 Where does it say that? I didn't see anywhere where it said he was nearly 18 nor did I see that he was 5 days after his 17th birthday Well hes not 17 going on 19 is he . Doh:rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pottedplant Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 Well hes not 17 going on 19 is he . Doh:rolleyes: but he could be 15 plus 367 days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
normansmum Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 Well hes not 17 going on 19 is he . Doh:rolleyes: He could also be 2 days after his 17th birthday - doh:rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adyfife Posted February 20, 2012 Author Share Posted February 20, 2012 hello again, thanks for everyones views and opinions, me and my daughter have been reading your replys and discussing which ones we agree with and why Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number Six Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 hello again, thanks for everyones views and opinions, me and my daughter have been reading your replys and discussing which ones we agree with and why Excellent news that you can talk about it sensibly. Unlike most of us lot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pottedplant Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 hello again, thanks for everyones views and opinions, me and my daughter have been reading your replys and discussing which ones we agree with and why That is fantastic - well done the two of you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.