shims Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 Why do you say that? Many reasons. Not enough categories, the breakdown of the categories is vague, Scandinavians are separated from 'West European', people from England, USA and Australian are presumed 'white' etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murphy Jnr Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 Mmmmm I find the forehead thing a bit of a put off... Strange as they're ribbed to excite! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamingjimmy Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 How very . . . politically correct. I knew someone would say that. It's really not true though, I just actually don't have a preference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conrod Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 Many reasons. Not enough categories, the breakdown of the categories is vague, Scandinavians are separated from 'West European', people from England, USA and Australian are presumed 'white' etc.Call me a bluff old traditionalist, but am I not right in thinking that the vast majority of people form England/USA/Australia ARE white? And is it not, still, correct that the propensity for light-skinned blond women in Scandinavian countries is higher than the rest of Europe (just as Spaniards and Italians tend to be darker haired)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamingjimmy Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 It's also kind of silly the way that white, eastern european, and scandinavian, are all differentiated, whilst there is only one category for 'black'. Despite the fact that there are literally hundreds of different 'races' within what would be termed as black. In fact, there is more genetic diversity within africa than the rest of the world combined. Something similar could be said for 'latino'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shims Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 Call me a bluff old traditionalist, but am I not right in thinking that the vast majority of people form England/USA/Australia ARE white? The US and Australia are not indigenously white/ European and to me, would be poor examples as they are not the source of these ethnic types. The white people in the US and Australia comprise those from all nations where white Europeans originate ie. they could be Scandinavian but that's a separate category. And is it not, still, correct that the propensity for light-skinned blond women in Scandinavian countries is higher than the rest of Europe (just as Spaniards and Italians tend to be darker haired)? The majority of light blonde comes from a bottle, whether it be Scandinavia or the UK. Besides there isn't a more specific category for Spanish and Italian women to fall into unless they are 'Eastern European'. I believe the categories are a little random. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nagel Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 It's also kind of silly the way that white, eastern european, and scandinavian, are all differentiated, whilst there is only one category for 'black'. Despite the fact that there are literally hundreds of different 'races' within what would be termed as black. In fact, there is more genetic diversity within africa than the rest of the world combined. Something similar could be said for 'latino'. Quite. One thing I noticed travelling around different countries in Africa was just how much variation there is amongst Africans. For instance in Gabon the women were mostly unattractive whilst the Ivory Coast seemed be be populated mostly by supermodels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harleyman Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 Chinese and Japanese .......... generally very attractive. Not many fatsos yet Thai and Vietnamese........... Some real beauties Hindu women.......high cast.... Some have beautiful features African women...... Caribbeam mixed blood.......... some real beauties Russian women........ look good sitting on a tractor German and Polish....... beat you at arm wrestling every time Scandinavian........ the best in the white category but some competition from the Irish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conrod Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 It's also kind of silly the way that white, eastern european, and scandinavian, are all differentiated, whilst there is only one category for 'black'. Despite the fact that there are literally hundreds of different 'races' within what would be termed as black. In fact, there is more genetic diversity within africa than the rest of the world combined. Something similar could be said for 'latino'.But perhaps, as we are mostly white people living in a predominantly white country, most of us (excepting those wishing to make a politically correct point or bring racism into the discussion) would be more interetsted in variances of caucasion types than negroid types? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old tup Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 Any nationality got to be blonde with a 48" bust private parts like a mouses ear and the IQ of a pork pie!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.