CXC3000 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 The wife of the recently deceased nuclear scientist in Iran. So the right man was got. Perhaps now we can stop debating Iran's intentions, as they seem clear as day - and start debating over what to do about the mad Mullahs and their regime. http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4193784,00.html http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=9010175602 Sorry but I don't believe that nonsense, especially when it's published from a pro-Israeli source. And wonder who translated what the woman said ? - surely it couldn't have been one sympathetic to Tel Aviv, could it ? He not likey Israel, we not likey nuclear armageddon . Hey ID, you may want to read this little gem : Speaking during an interview which was published in Jerusalem Friday, Professor Martin Van Crevel said Israel had the capability of hitting most European capitals with nuclear weapons. "We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets of our air force." http://www.rense.com/general34/esde.htm Who's the real threat to world peace ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Who's the real thread to world peace ? Might I humbly suggest that a country which has possessed nuclear weapons for more than twenty years, and conspicuously failed to launch them at anybody, is not the real threat to world peace. If Israel's intention were to wipe some country or other off the map, they could have done it in 1987. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 And all this sabre-rattling by the Israeli extremists (against Iran) is not a sign that they will use their nukes People have been arguing that that's exactly what it is, for twenty-odd years. They've always been wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phanerothyme Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Is that the royal we? No it's not. All we see on these boards are the fag ends of the propaganda mouthpieces of the respective regimes, and their proxies, parroting the same tired agitprop. Alchresearch is far from alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CXC3000 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 People have been arguing that that's exactly what it is, for twenty-odd years. They've always been wrong. Maybe because Iran hadn't engaged in any civilian nuclear program before ? The Zionists won't even allow them to have that. And how dare they dictate to others what they can and can't have when they haven't even admitted to possessing nukes themselves. Cowards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andygardener Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 And all this sabre-rattling by the Israeli extremists (against Iran) is not a sign that they will use their nukes ? Yeah, ok... It's pretty widely accepted that Israel had operational nukes not long after the 6 day war. Given that if they were inclined to use them then surely they would have used them in 73? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Maybe because Iran hadn't engaged in any civilian nuclear program before ? It doesn't look like they have now, does it? Or had you not read the original post? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CXC3000 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 It's pretty widely accepted that Israel had operational nukes not long after the 6 day war. Given that if they were inclined to use them then surely they would have used them in 73? Yes, widely accepted by the rest of the world but Israel itself. Doesn't Tel Aviv know how pathetic that makes it ? It doesn't look like they have now, does it? Or had you not read the original post? Probably because Israel had no-one to fight their dirty wars at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andygardener Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Yes, widely accepted by the rest of the world but Israel itself. Doesn't Tel Aviv know how pathetic that makes it ? I think it's widely accepted in Israel too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willie Pete Posted February 23, 2012 Author Share Posted February 23, 2012 It's pretty widely accepted that Israel had operational nukes not long after the 6 day war. Given that if they were inclined to use them then surely they would have used them in 73? Some reports suggest they had a viable nuke in '67 too. It was crude, but in working order. Another rumour is that they printed on the first nuke "never again". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.